Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority
Decision Date | 13 February 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 4788,4788 |
Citation | 575 P.2d 1100 |
Parties | Edwin J. WITZENBURGER, State Treasurer of the State of Wyoming, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Wyoming ex rel. WYOMING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, Appellee (Plaintiff below), v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Intervenor below). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Thomas S. Smith, Smith, Stanfield & Scott, Laramie, signed the brief and appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellant.
Dean W. Borthwick, Borthwick & McCall, Cheyenne, signed the brief and appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellee.
V. Frank Mendicino, Atty. Gen., and Steve F. Freudenthal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cheyenne, signed the brief and V. Frank Mendicino, appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellee-intervenor.
Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLINTOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.
The Forty-third Wyoming State Legislature enacted the "Wyoming Community Development Authority Act,"Chapter 188, Session Laws of Wyoming, 1975, appearing in the Wyoming Statutes as §§ 9-826 through 9-848, W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp.; in this opinion it will be referred to as "the Act."Its constitutionality has been challenged by the appellant-defendant, the State Treasurer, State of Wyoming.The district judge in an action for declaratory judgment brought by the appellee-plaintiff, the Wyoming Community Development Authority, reserved to this court 14 separate constitutional questions.1 The principal question is whether revenue bonds issued by the Wyoming Community Development Authority, for the payment of which excise tax revenue to be derived in future years is committed under the so-called "special" fund theory, come within the debt limit prohibitions of §§ 1and2, Article XVI, Wyoming Constitution:
We shall hold that such a pledge by a state agency and the legislature to pay off bonds issued for money borrowed by the Authority from revenues to be derived from excise taxes, in whole or in part, to be collected in the future is unconstitutional and explain why.The other constitutional questions reserved and questions raised on appeal will be discussed and decided to the extent necessary as they are reached in the opinion.
The Wyoming Community Development Authority Act is a complex piece of legislation, relating to the issuance of tax-free (§ 9-841) revenue bonds to finance public facilities of the state or any of its agencies, counties, municipalities or political subdivisions pronounced necessary by the legislature, due to the expansion of mineral activity within the state, causing impacted situations in various localities.The legislature declared its findings and purposes in enactment of the law in the language of § 9-827:
(Emphasis added.)
In order to carry out those purposes, the Wyoming Community Development Authority was created.It will be referred to in this opinion as the "Authority."It was declared to be "a body corporate and politic, constituting a political subdivision of the state operated solely for the public benefit."Its membership consists of 10 directors, appointed by the governor, with the advice and consent of the senate.The Authority is declared to be perpetual or until terminated by law, provided that in the latter case, there are no other bonds or other obligations of the Authority outstanding, unless provision be made for their payment.Section 9-829, W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp.
The Authority has extensive powers, including the right to sue or be sued, have a seal, execute contracts, make by-laws, contract with any person, municipality or state agency, purchase and hold property, as well as sell and transfer it, build civic projects or water projects, manage projects, provide advisory, consultative or educational services to anyone, public or private, lend money to municipalities and state agencies, 2 borrow money and issue its negotiable bonds and provide for the rights of the holders, mortgage or pledge any or all of its revenue or property, invest funds in all types of indebtedness, including the purchase of loans from mortgage lenders, residential real property, make loans to mortgage lenders and, finally, to do any and all things necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes and exercise the powers granted.A large portion of the Act is devoted to its power to issue its tax-free negotiable bonds, including a limitation on such issue to $100,000,000.00 outstanding at any time.Section 9-837.
By § 9-839, the legislature provided that debt service funds be established by the Authority to secure payment of outstanding bonds, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mills v. Reynolds
...denied 449 U.S. 824, 101 S.Ct. 86, 66 L.Ed.2d 28 (1980). See Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401 (Wyo.1990); Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority, 575 P.2d 1100, reh. denied 577 P.2d 1386 (Wyo.1978). A party attacking a statute on constitutional grounds must do mo......
-
White v. State
...1 v. Washakie County School District Number 1, 449 U.S. 824, 101 S.Ct. 86, 66 L.Ed.2d 28 (1980); Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority, 575 P.2d 1100, reh'g denied 577 P.2d 1386 (Wyo.1978). Comparably immersed in shame was the denial of required legislative r......
-
Billis v. State
...the legislature has enacted if that is at all possible, and any doubt must be resolved in favor of constitutionality. Witzenburger v. State, Wyo.1978, 575 P.2d 1100, 1112; Lund v. Schrader, Wyo.1971, 492 P.2d 202, 206. Though the supreme court has the duty to give great deference to legisla......
-
Director, Office of State Lands v. Merbanco
...the legislature may enact any law not expressly or inferentially prohibited by the constitution. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority, 575 P.2d 1100 (Wyo.1978). [¶ 46] The early history of the state's exercise of its authority over school lands is important ......