Wood v. NC State University, 11P02.
Decision Date | 06 March 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 11P02.,11P02. |
Citation | 561 S.E.2d 887,355 N.C. 292 |
Parties | Kathy A. WOOD and Evalyn Gonzales v. N.C. STATE UNIVERSITY. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Harold L. Kennedy, III, Harvey L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for Wood & Gonzales.
Thomas O. Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. State University.
Prior report: 147 N.C.App. 336, 556 S.E.2d 38.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2002."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hooper v. North Carolina
...NCSU, and any such claim would proceed, if at all, under the Tort Claims Act in the Industrial Commission."), review denied, 355 N.C. 292, 561 S.E.2d 887 (2002). The State of North Carolina's wiretapping act contains no clear intent to waive the State's immunity. See N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-29......
-
Green v. Kearney
...this Article." In Wood v. N.C. State Univ., 147 N.C.App. 336, 556 S.E.2d 38 (2001), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 292, 561 S.E.2d 887 (2002), this Court addressed whether N.C. Gen.Stat. § 143-291(b) waives the State's sovereign immunity beyond that established in N.C. G......
-
Hill v. Medford
...appellate review." Wood v. N.C. State Univ., 147 N.C.App. 336, 337-338, 556 S.E.2d 38, 39 (2001),disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 292, 561 S.E.2d 887 (2002) (quoting Price v. Davis, 132 N.C.App. 556, 558-559, 512 S.E.2d 783, 785 (1999)). Thus, although this appeal is interlocutory, it is prope......
-
Huber v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
...NCSU is a State agency, Wood v. N.C. State Univ., 147 N.C.App. 336, 338, 556 S.E.2d 38, 40 (2001), disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 292, 561 S.E.2d 887 (2002), NCSU and Younce in his official capacity are entitled to sovereign immunity against Plaintiff's federal wiretap claim. See Alden v. Ma......