Woods v. Comm'r of Corr.
| Decision Date | 15 December 2021 |
| Docket Number | SC 20487 |
| Citation | 267 A.3d 193 (Mem),341 Conn. 506 |
| Parties | Jermaine WOODS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Vishal K. Garg, for the appellant (petitioner).
Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Nancy L. Walker, assistant state's attorney, Maureen Platt, state's attorney, and Eva Lenczewski, supervisory assistant state's attorney.
Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.
The petitioner, Jermaine Woods, appeals, upon our grant of his petition for certification,1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court dismissing his appeal from the judgment of the habeas court, which dismissed his third petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Woods v. Commissioner of Correction , 197 Conn. App. 597, 599–600, 232 A.3d 63 (2020). On appeal, the petitioner contends that the Appellate Court improperly construed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which he had filed as a self-represented party, in concluding that it did not raise a claim that counsel at the petitioner's second habeas trial, which was held in 2011, provided ineffective assistance by not challenging the failure of defense counsel at his 2006 murder trial to present evidence as to his diminished capacity.
After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
* December 15, 2021, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
1 We granted the petitioner's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pro se, did not raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to the petitioner's second habeas trial?" Woods v. Commissioner of Correction , 335 Conn. 938, 248 A.3d 708 (2020).
To continue reading
Request your trial
- L. H.-S. v. N. B.
-
Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction
...marks omitted.) Woods v. Commissioner of Correction , 197 Conn. App. 597, 612–13, 232 A.3d 63 (2020), appeal dismissed, 341 Conn. 506, 267 A.3d 193 (2021)."In the context of a habeas action, a court must determine whether a petitioner actually has raised a new legal ground for relief or onl......
-
Velasco v. Comm'r of Corr.
...quotation marks omitted.) Woods v. Commissioner of Correction , 197 Conn. App. 597, 607, 232 A.3d 63 (2020), appeal dismissed, 341 Conn. 506, 267 A.3d 193 (2021)."A trial court has the inherent power to enforce summarily a settlement agreement as a matter of law when the terms of the agreem......
-
Taylor v. Comm'r of Corr.
...the [petition] is insufficient to allow recovery." (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.)), appeal dismissed, 341 Conn. 506, 267 A.3d 193 (2021). Practice Book § 23-29, which governs motions to dismiss habeas petitions, "serves, roughly speaking, as the analog to Practice Boo......