Worley v. State

Decision Date25 May 1921
Docket Number(No. 6290.)
Citation231 S.W. 391
PartiesWORLEY v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Young County Court; W. H. Reeves, Judge.

J. A. Worley was convicted of negligent homicide, and he appeals. Reversed, and cause dismissed.

Marshall & King, of Graham, and Kay, Akin & Kenley, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

R. H. Hamilton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of negligent homicide.

We quote the indictment, omitting the formal part:

"One J. D. Worley did then and there unlawfully operate a motor vehicle, to wit, an automobile upon a public highway of the state of Texas, to wit, a public street of the city of Graham, Young county, Tex., and did then and there while so operating said motor vehicle, willfully, and with gross negligence, collide with and injure another person, to wit, Baxter Harley, the said Baxter Harley being then and there a pedestrian upon such highway, which said injuries did then and there result in the death of the said Baxter Harley, against the peace and dignity of the state," etc.

In Automobile Law of 1917, § 35 (article 1022a of Vernon's Ann. Penal Code Supp. 1918), we find the following:

"If any driver or operator of a motor vehicle or motorcycle upon the public highways of this state shall willfully or with gross negligence, collide with, or cause injury to any other person upon such highway, he shall be held guilty of aggravated assault, and shall be punished accordingly, unless such injuries result in death, in which event said party so offending shall be dealt with under the general law of homicide."

It was not the purpose or effect of this statute to change the law of homicide, but the object was to add a new clause to the law of aggravated assault. The various elements of the law of homicide are contained in the Code:

Negligent homicide is "such as happens in the performance of a lawful act," and such as "occurs in the performance of an unlawful act." Penal Code, art. 1113.

One who, "in the performance of a lawful act, shall, by negligence and carelessness, cause the death of another, * * * is guilty of negligent homicide of the first degree." Penal Code, art. 1114.

"To constitute this offense, there must be an apparent danger of causing the death of the person killed, or some other." Penal Code, art. 1116.

"To bring the offense within the definition of homicide by negligence, either of the first or second degree, there must be no apparent intention to kill." Penal Code, art. 1119.

Doubtless one, by the use...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Gee
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 3 Febrero 1930
    ... ... (C ... S., secs. 8825, 8827; 1921 Sess. Laws, chap. 155, p. 348; ... 1927 Sess. Laws, chap. 260, p. 482; State v. Smith, ... 25 Idaho 541, at 545, 138 P. 1107, 1108; State v ... Gesas, 49 Utah 181, 162 P. 366; 30 C. J., p. 97, secs ... 284, [48 Idaho 691] 285; Worley v. State, 89 ... Tex.Crim. 393, 231 S.W. 391. See Hayes v. State, 11 Ga.App ... 371, 75 S.E. 523.) ... Where ... one, through no fault of his own is suddenly confronted with ... an emergency, he is not held to the same degree of care ... required in other cases. ( State v ... ...
  • Gann v. Murray
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 27 Febrero 1952
    ...40 Tex.Cr.R. 154, 49 S.W. 100; Gorden v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 90 S.W. 636; Outley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 99 S.W. 95; Worley v. State, 89 Tex.Cr.R. 393, 231 S.W. 391; Brown v. State, 103 Tex.Cr.R. 35, 279 S.W. 837; Lahue v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 159, 101 S.W. 1008; Noble v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. ......
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 20 Enero 1926
    ...could have been avoided by prudence after the danger arose. See Hoffman v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 11, 209 S. W. 747; Worley v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 393, 231 S. W. 391; Gribble v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 52, 210 S. W. 215, 3 A. L. R. 1096; Haynes v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 42, 224 S. W. 1100; Id......
  • Van Arsdale v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 20 Diciembre 1922
    ...held responsible for the result in bringing about or in failing to avert the danger. The language used in the case of Worley v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 393, 231 S. W. 391, in conflict with this view, was not necessary in deciding the questions, and will be modified to accord with the conclusi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT