Wyatt v. State
| Decision Date | 04 May 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 46648,46648 |
| Citation | 259 Ga. 208,378 S.E.2d 690 |
| Parties | WYATT v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Robert C. Sacks, Snellville, for George Ponder Wyatt.
Thomas C. Lawler III, Dist. Atty., Lawrenceville, Debra K. Turner, Asst. Atty. for the State.
George Ponder Wyatt was convicted of trafficking in cocaine in violation of OCGA § 16-13-31. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment and fined $100,000. We affirm.
Wyatt asserts that the evidence does not support the verdict and that statute's mandatory fine provision violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Sec. I, Para. XVII of the 1983 Georgia Constitution.
1. Construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence showed that Wyatt participated in the sale of three ounces of cocaine to an informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration. He was present during the sale and participated in packaging and weighing the cocaine. When there was a shortfall in the amount, he commented, "... we'll make the difference up out of ours." After the sale, Wyatt was arrested at the scene of the sale and drug paraphernalia was seized. We conclude that this evidence is sufficient to support the jury's finding Wyatt guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of trafficking in cocaine. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. Under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, a punishment is excessive so as to amount to cruel and unusual punishment if it "(1) makes no measurable contribution to accepted goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime." Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977). We hold that the fine imposed under OCGA § 16-13-31 is not out of proportion to the severity of the crime and is not constitutionally infirm either because of its mandatory nature or its amount. See Hargrove v. State, 253 Ga. 450, 321 S.E.2d 104 (1984) (); and Grant v. State, 258 Ga. 299, 368 S.E.2d 737 (1988) (). 1
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
1 Wyatt does not challenge the statute on Fourteenth Amendment grounds. This case does not present the problem of incarceration of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Humphrey v. Wilson
...259 Ga. at 689, 386 S.E.2d 339 (citations omitted). Accord Johnson v. State, 276 Ga. 57, 62, 573 S.E.2d 362 (2002); Wyatt v. State, 259 Ga. 208, 209, 378 S.E.2d 690 (1989); Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977). 19. Fleming, 259 Ga. at 689, 386 S.E.2d 339, quo......
-
Fleming v. Zant
...and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.' " Wyatt v. State, 259 Ga. 208, 209, 378 S.E.2d 690 (1989) (quoting Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977)). Further, the constitutional standard re......
-
Green v. State, A99A1611.
...mandatory fines imposed under OCGA § 16-13-31 violate constitutional standards has been decided adversely to him in Wyatt v. State, 259 Ga. 208, 209(2), 378 S.E.2d 690 (1989). Judgment POPE, P.J., and ELDRIDGE, J., concur. ...
-
Woodruff v. State
...U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 2. Hall v. State, 235 Ga.App. 44, 45(1), 508 S.E.2d 703 (1998). 3. Wyatt v. State, 259 Ga. 208(1), 378 S.E.2d 690 (1989); see OCGA § 16-13-31(a)(1) ("[a]ny person who knowingly sells, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state or who is......