Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center

Decision Date15 January 2004
Docket Number2141
Citation3 A.D.3d 376,771 N.Y.S.2d 94,2004 NY Slip Op 00201
PartiesCLIFTON WYNTER et al., Appellants, v. OUR LADY OF MERCY MEDICAL CENTER et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Plaintiffs allege that when plaintiff Clifton Wynter fell on a sidewalk and injured his neck and head, an ambulance crew from defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation responded and transported him to defendant medical center, where he stayed for a brief period during which he was treated by the individual medical professional defendants. The amended verified complaint alleged medical malpractice arising from defendants' failure to diagnose, stabilize and promptly treat a spinal cord injury, resulting in serious permanent physical injuries as well as mental and emotional harm. Othilda Wynter, Clifton's wife, sued for loss of consortium and services. The verified bills of particulars provide further clarification regarding the alleged departures from accepted medical practices in support of the malpractice cause of action. More specifically, plaintiffs alleged that Clifton Wynter suffered quadriplegia as a consequence of the malpractice, with resulting incontinence and bladder problems. He died intestate on December 26, 1999. Letters of administration were issued to Othilda Wynter on December 12, 2001, who subsequently moved to be substituted for decedent.

During the interim, a law firm and present counsel Bruce Katz were disputing who represented plaintiffs. The dispute regarding representation was decided by a January 17, 2001 order of Bronx County Supreme Court (Stanley Green, J.), directing that Katz represent plaintiffs.

Also during the interim, additional motion practice had ensued in the present action including dismissal motions related to the lack of progress in the litigation, during which time Katz became ill and underwent surgery. Unfortunately, in the aftermath of the destruction of the World Trade Center, Katz also was displaced from his home, which was located 500 feet from Ground Zero. As a consequence, he lost many files. Defendants moved thereafter to dismiss for plaintiffs' failure to appoint an administrator.

On December 17, 2001, plaintiff cross-moved to substitute Othilda Wynter as executor and to submit an amended complaint, now adding a cause of action for wrongful death. In that connection, a physician's affirmation of merit was submitted in which the physician averred that the quadriplegia caused by Clifton Wynter's original fall resulted in his incontinence and the consequential necessity of chronic urinary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Public Adm'r v. Levine
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Agosto 2016
    ...must provide “a reasonable excuse for the delay” and make “a prima facie showing of merit” (Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94 [1st Dept.2004], citing Schwartz v. Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 305 A.D.2d 174, 176, 761 N.Y.S.2d 5 [1st Dept.2003] ). In o......
  • Menkes v. Beth Abraham Health Servs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 23 Mayo 2008
    ...a delay. These combined factors provide a reasonable excuse for plaintiff's delay in moving to amend. Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378 (1st Dep't 2004); Schwartz v. Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 305 A.D.2d at 176. Moreover, while the original bill of particulars did ......
  • White v. Diallo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Diciembre 2017
    ...(see Public Adm'r v. Levine, 142 A.D.3d 467, 468–469, 37 N.Y.S.3d 475 ; 64 N.Y.S.3d 564 Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94 ; see also Foley v. Foley, 151 A.D.3d 1018, 1018, 57 N.Y.S.3d 211 ). Moreover, there is a strong public policy that matters shoul......
  • Petion v. N.Y.C. Health & Hosps. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Agosto 2019
    ...solely on the passage of time (see Public Adm'r v. Levine, 142 A.D.3d at 469–470, 37 N.Y.S.3d 475 ; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94 ). The plaintiffs also demonstrated that they have potentially meritorious causes of action through their expert's af......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT