Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.

Decision Date04 January 1952
Citation328 Mass. 219,103 N.E.2d 230
PartiesWYSHAK v. ANACONDA COPPER MINING CO.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

R. H. Wyshak, Boston, for plaintiff.

T. Chase, Boston, M. C. Gogan, Lynn, for defendant.

Before QUA, C. J., and WILKINS, SPALDING and WILLIAMS, JJ.

WILKINS, Justice.

In this action of contract or tort commenced by trustee process against Anaconda Copper Mining Company, a Montana corporation having no usual place of business in this Commonwealth, the writ names American Brass Company, a Connecticut corporation, as trustee. The declaration alleges that the plaintiff, a resident of Newton, is a shareholder of Anaconda, and seeks to recover damages for the retention and withholding of cash dividends declared by Anaconda. The alleged trustee filed an answer in abatement setting forth that it is a Connecticut corporation, that its sole business in Massachusetts is in connection with soliciting orders in interstate commerce and that it has no usual place of business here. Anaconda also filed an answer in abatement on the ground that it was not engaged in any business in this Commonwealth, and that the trustee was not subject to the service of process here, so that the defendant had no goods, effects, or credits in the hands of the trustee subject to the jurisdiction of the court. An order was entered sustaining both answers in abatement, and the plaintiff excepted.

General Laws (Ter.Ed.) c. 246, § 1, as appearing in St.1938, c. 303, § 1, as amended by St.1943, c. 17, § 1, in part provides: 'All personal actions * * * [with immaterial exceptions] may be commenced by trustee process, and any person may be summoned as trustee of the defendant therein * * *. An individual who is not an inhabitant of the commonwealth, or a foreign corporation or association, shall not be so summoned unless he or it has a usual place of business in the commonwealth.' The question is whether the American Brass Company on the evidence should have been found to have a usual place of business in this Commonwealth so that it could be summoned as trustee under this statute.

The only witness was the district sales manager of the American Brass Company, who was called by the trustee. A summary of his testimony follows. His office is in the Kendall Building at 238 Main Street, Cambridge, and service of the writ was made upon him. The office consists of from two to three thousand square feet of space, which is divided into two private offices and an outside office. There are there desks, files, typewriters, and the usual office furniture, all owned by American Brass. There are three girls, who answer telephones and do stenographic work, six outside salesmen, and one inside salesman, who solicits orders by telephone. American Brass has a lease of the premises which was executed at the main office in Waterbury, Connecticut. The rent is paid by check mailed from Connecticut. No books of account are kept here. The files contain correspondence regarding orders originating here and expense account records. The business here consists of the solicitation of orders and also promotional work. The salesmen get in touch with contractors and attempt to convince them of the superiority of American Brass and Anaconda products, so that when the time comes they will order them. The territory covered by this district sales office includes New Hampshire, Maine, and most of Massachusetts. Approximately fifty per cent of the orders from this territory come into the office; the remainder go directly to the mills, all of which are located outside of this Commonwealth. If a salesman is calling on a customer, he will take his order and tell him to mail it to Cambridge. It will then be forwarded to Connecticut ordinarily, but if the order is for a material which is made at a mill in Detroit, the order will be forwarded there directly. The Cambridge office has no authority to accept orders. These must be accepted at the mill, where they are acknowledged directly to the customer. Orders are filled by shipment from the mill to the customer. When an order is accepted, a copy of the acknowledgment is sent to the Cambridge office. There are no inventory, storage, or delivery facilities in Massachusetts. All billing is done by the mill directly to the customer. There is no bank account here in the name of American Brass. There is an expense account in the witness's name for travel and entertainment of customers, from which small expenditures are made for office incidentals, such as policemen's ball tickets, stamps, and the like. The salaries of the employees are paid from Connecticut. No collections are made. If a customer should send a payment to Cambridge, it is forwarded to Connecticut. In the event of a complaint, the salesman for the account makes an investigation, and reports the facts to the Connecticut office for disposition. He cannot compromise a claim or authorize the return of goods. The trustee's letterhead used in correspondence is, 'The American Brass Company, 238 Main St., Cambridge 42, Mass.' The letterhead used in negotiation of orders and for quotations has in addition a provision that all...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Wilensky v. Standard Beryllium Corporation, Civ. A. No. 62-964-C
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • April 21, 1964
    ...182 F.Supp. 717, 720 (D.Mass. 1960); Jet Mfg. Co. v. Sanford Ink Co., 330 Mass. 173, 112 N.E.2d 252 (1953); Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 328 Mass. 219, 103 N.E.2d 230 (1952)), and it is also clear that where the sale of stock is the customary business of a given corporation it may ......
  • Remington Arms Co. v. Lechmere Tire & Sales Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1959
    ...(§ 22). The plaintiff concedes that it might be subject to the service of process in this Commonwealth. See Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 328 Mass. 219, 103 N.E.2d 230; Jet Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Sanford Ink Co., 330 Mass. 173, 112 N.E.2d Its contentions are (1) that the qualification re......
  • Samson Cordage Works v. Wellington Puritan Mills, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • April 25, 1969
    ...F.Supp. 864; Id., D.C., 108 F. Supp. 883; Formmaster Corp. v. G. H. Bishop Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 138 F.Supp. 115; Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 328 Mass. 219, 103 N.E. 2d 230; Jet Manufacturing Co. v. Sanford Ink Co., 330 Mass. 173, 112 N.E.2d Accordingly, I find no less so, that defen......
  • Guay v. Ozark Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • June 7, 1978
    ...reviews Massachusetts law, first discussing two cases where personal jurisdiction was found. In both Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 328 Mass. 219, 103 N.E.2d 230 (1952) and Jet Mfg. Co. v. Sanford Ink Co., 330 Mass. 173, 113 N.E.2d 252 (1953) service was made on a resident sales mana......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT