Zenner v. Graham

Decision Date11 January 1904
Citation34 Wash. 81,74 P. 1058
PartiesZENNER v. GRAHAM, Sheriff.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Application for a writ of habeas corpus by Frank Zenner, relator, against J. A. Graham, sheriff of Chehalis county. Denied.

W. H Abel, for relator.

Sidney Moor Heath, for respondent.

MOUNT J.

Application for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was convicted in the superior court of Chehalis county of the crime of living with and accepting the earnings of a prostitute. He was thereupon sentenced to a term of three years in the penitentiary.

The prosecution was based on the act of March 16, 1903 (Laws 1903, p. 230, c. 123). The petitioner alleges that this act is void by reason of the insufficiency of the title thereof and because it is contrary to the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and is class legislation. Petitioner's counsel in his brief argues that the information is insufficient for several reasons. We shall not discuss these questions, because they do not go to the jurisdiction of the trial court. The rulings of the trial court in the trial of the case, if erroneous, cannot be reviewed in this proceeding. Such questions must be brought here in the regular way by appeal. In re Nolan, 21 Wash. 395, 58 P. 222, and cases cited; In re Casey, 27 Wash. 686, 68 P. 185.

Petitioner was informed against and convicted under the provisions of section 2 of the act of 1903, which is as follows: 'Any male person who lives with, or who lives off of, in whole or in part, or accepts any of the earnings of a prostitute, or connives in or solicits or attempts to solicit any male person or persons to have sexual intercourse, or cohabit with a prostitute, or who shall invite, direct or solicit any person to go to a house of ill-fame, for any immoral purpose or any person who shall entice, decoy, place, take or receive any female child or person under the age of eighteen years into any house of ill-fame or disorderly house, or any house, for the purpose of prostitution; or any person who, having in his or her custody or control such child, shall dispose of it to be so received, or to be received in or for any obscene, indecent or immoral purpose, exhibition or practice, shall be deemed guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than five years, and fined in any sum not less than one thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars.' The title to the act is as follows: 'An act relating to husbands who connive at the prostitution of their wives and to persons who live off or accept the earnings of prostitutes, or solicit persons to go to houses of ill-fame for immoral purposes, or who permit or solicit females under eighteen years of age to enter any house of ill-fame, or other houses for immoral purposes, declaring the violation hereof a felony, and fixing a punishment.' The subject of this act is certainly expressed in the title, which clearly points out the general purpose and scope of the act. The purpose of the constitutional provision that the subject of the act shall be expressed in the title does not mean that the title shall be an index to the act...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Derbyshire
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • April 25, 1914
    ... ... 31, 78 P. 36; State ex rel ... Osborne, Tremper & Co. v. Nichols, 38 Wash. 309, 80 P ... 462; State ex rel. Zenner v. Graham, 34 Wash. 81, 74 ... P. 1058; Shortall v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging ... Co., 45 Wash. 290, 88 P. 212 [122 Am. St. Rep ... ...
  • State v. Devall
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1974
    ...(1911), or which makes it a criminal offense for a male person to live with, or to accept the earnings of, a prostitute. Zenner v. Graham, 34 Wash. 81, 74 P. 1058 (1904). At the outset it must be noted that no evidence whatsoever has been introduced to support the defendant's position. With......
  • Hogue v. Port of Seattle
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • June 11, 1959
    ...every reasonable intendment in favor of the act, it may be said that the subject is expressed in the title. State ex rel. Zenner v. Graham, 1904, 34 Wash. 81, 74 P. 1058. In order to decide the principal question presented by this appeal, it is necessary to have in mind various provisions o......
  • State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. Department of Public Service, 27653.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1939
    ... ... department of public service ... In ... State ex rel. Zenner v. Graham, 34 Wash. 81, 74 P ... 1058, 1059, it is stated: 'The purpose of the ... constitutional provision that the subject of the act ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT