Zwick v. State, 97-2114.

Decision Date19 March 1999
Docket NumberNo. 97-2114.,97-2114.
Citation730 So.2d 759
PartiesMichael J. ZWICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kelli R. Orndorff, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

THOMPSON, J.

Michael J. Zwick appeals his convictions for sexual battery on a child under 12, three counts of lewd or indecent assault on a child, and one count of attempted lewd or indecent assault on a child. We affirm the sexual battery conviction because the asserted error with regard to this conviction was either harmless or not preserved. We reverse the convictions for lewd or indecent assault.

As to counts two and five, the state charged that Zwick:

did then and there commit DEVIANT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, MASTURBATION upon a child, [THE VICTIM] who was then under the age of sixteen (16) years by RUBBING HIS PENIS ON [THE VICTIM'S] BUTTOCKS contrary to section 800.04(2).

More expansively, the jury was charged as follows:

Before you can find the Defendant guilty of lewd, lascivious or indecent act upon a child, the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
Number one, [the victim] was under the age of sixteen years;
Number two, Michael James Zwick committed upon [the victim] actual or simulated sexual intercourse, masturbation, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals, or any act or conduct which simulated that sexual battery was being or would be committed on [the victim].
Counts three and four alleged that Zwick:
did then and there force or entice a child, [THE VICTIM] who was then under the age of sixteen (16) years, to commit MASTURBATION by MAKING [THE VICTIM] TOUCH, RUB HIS PENIS, MASTURBATE HIM contrary to section 800.04(2).
The jury instruction was more expansive: Before you can find the Defendant guilty of forcing or enticing a child to commit a lewd, lascivious or indecent act, the State must prove. beyond a reasonable doubt: Number one, [the victim] was under the age of sixteen years;
Number two, Michael James Zwick committed upon [the victim] or forced or enticed [the victim] to commit masturbation or actual lewd exhibition of genitals.

A defendant is entitled to have the charge against him proved substantially as alleged in the indictment or information and cannot be prosecuted for one offense and convicted and sentenced for another, though the offenses are of the same general character or carry the same penalty. Jacobs v. State, 184 So.2d 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).

[w]here an
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Morgan v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 30, 2014
    ...v. State, 913 So.2d 729, 730 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; D.R. v. State, 790 So.2d 1242, 1244–45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; Zwick v. State, 730 So.2d 759, 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Consistent with this rule, a criminal defendant is entitled to a trial on the charges contained in the information and may ......
  • Morgan v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 22, 2013
    ...v. State, 913 So. 2d 729, 730 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); D.R. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1242, 1244-45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Zwick v. State, 730 So. 2d 759, 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Consistent with this rule, a criminal defendant is entitled to a trial on the charges contained in the information and may......
  • Fesh v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 2021
    ...730 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; then citing D.R. v. State , 790 So. 2d 1242, 1244-45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; and then citing Zwick v. State , 730 So. 2d 759, 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) )."Evidence that a defendant committed a collateral crime is inherently prejudicial because it creates the risk that ......
  • DR v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 10, 2001
    ...(Fla. 5th DCA 1986); c.f. Van Gotum v. State, 569 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 1311 (Fla.1991). Zwick v. State, 730 So.2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). In Rallo v. State, 726 So.2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), the defendant was charged and convicted of willfully placing his pe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT