Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 91-4890
| Decision Date | 23 March 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-4890,91-4890 |
| Parties | Charles H. GUILLORY, Owner, on Behalf of the Stratos Model 274FS, and Underwriters of Lloyds of London, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OUTBOARD MOTOR CORP., et al., Defendants, Connie Deshotels, etc. and Police Jury Evangeline Parish, Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Rufus C. Harris, III, Robert B. Acomb, III, Terriberry, Carroll & Yancey, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Ronald J. Fiorenza, Provosty, Sadler & Delaunary, Alexandria, La., for Evangeline Police Jury.
Daniel J. McGee, Rozas, Manuel & McGee, Mamou, La., for Deshotels .
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
Charles Guillory brought this complaint for exoneration from or limitation of liability under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 181 et seq. The potential liability arises out of an incident that occurred when Guillory was operating his bass boat on the waters of Crooked Creek Reservoir in Louisiana. The district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Crooked Creek Reservoir is not a navigable waterway. We agree.
The Crooked Creek Reservoir is located in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, and was created for recreation and flood control by a dam constructed between Crooked Creek and Bayou Nezbique. Crooked Creek is located entirely within Evangeline Parish and the state of Louisiana. Vessels cannot access Bayou Nezbique because of the dam. Nor can they travel interstate to the waters of Crooked Creek. Even before construction of the dam, Crooked Creek was so shallow in depth and overgrown by brush that it was difficult, if not impossible, for any vessel to travel across its waters.
The Limitation of Liability Act does not confer jurisdiction upon federal courts. That must come from our admiralty jurisdiction under U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2 and 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1). Suits lacking any relationship to either navigable waters or traditional maritime activity are without admiralty jurisdiction. Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A., Ltd. v. Morts, 921 F.2d 775, 777 (8th Cir.1990), on remand from, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3265, 111 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990), vacating and remanding 878 F.2d 1096 (8th Cir.1989), and cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 272, 116 L.Ed.2d 224...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In the Matter of The Petition of Robert Carter v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...prong of the admiralty jurisdiction test—including more recent decisions by the Fifth Circuit. See Guillory v. Outboard Motors Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 114 (5th Cir.1992) (per curiam). Furthermore, even assuming for the sake of argument that the American Eastern Development court's reasoning wa......
-
Hickam v. Segars
...jurisdiction. See David Wright Charter Serv. of N. Car., Inc. v. Wright, 925 F.2d 783, 785 (4th Cir.1991); Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 115 (5th Cir.1992); In the Matter of Sisson, 867 F.2d 341, 349–350 (7th Cir.1989), rev'd on other grounds,497 U.S. 358, 110 S.Ct. 2892, ......
-
In re Bernstein
...785 (4th Cir.1991); Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A. Ltd. v. Morts, 921 F.2d 775, 779-80 (8th Cir.1990); Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 115 (5th Cir.1992). Although several of these decisions fail to mention or distinguish Richardson, the Ninth Circuit in Seven Resort......
-
In Matter of Fields
...See David Wright Charter Service of North Carolina, Inc. v. Wright, 925 F.2d 783, 785 (4th Cir.1991); Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 115 (5th Cir.1992); Complaint of Sisson, 867 F.2d 341, 350 (7th Cir.1989) rev'd on other grounds, 497 U.S. 358, 110 S.Ct. 2892, 111 L.Ed.2d 2......
-
Resolved: Is 46 U.S.C. [section] 30501(a) a Jurisdictional Statute of Limitations or a Mandatory Claims Processing Rule?
...982 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2020); In re Fish N Dive, LLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2017942 (D.C. Hi. 2020); Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1992); In Re Carter, 743 F. Supp. 2d 103 (D. Conn. 2010); David Wright Charter Serv. v. Wright, 925 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1991); Three B......
-
Admirality Law for the Land-side Alabama Lawyer
...not navigable in interstate commerce because of its position between two lockless dams, would not. See Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1992) (inland reservoir upstream from a lockless dam was not a navigable waterway for purposes of admiralty tort jurisdiction ......
-
Recent Developments in the Shipowner's Limitation of Liability Act.
...783 (4th Cir. 1991); Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U.S.A. Ltd. v. Morts, 921 F.2d 775 (8th Cir. 1990); Guillory v. Outboard Motor Corp., 956 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. (182) Sisson v. Ruby, 110 S. Ct. 2892 (1990). (183) Jerome B. Grubart Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 U.S. 527 (19......