Abernathy v. State, A94A1276
Decision Date | 03 August 1994 |
Docket Number | No. A94A1276,A94A1276 |
Citation | 448 S.E.2d 30,214 Ga.App. 364 |
Parties | ABERNATHY v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Scott J. Forster, Calhoun, for appellant.
Willis M. Abernathy, pro se.
T. Joseph Campbell, Dist. Atty., Rebecca B. Tierce, Mickey R. Thacker, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.
Defendant was charged, via indictment, with burglary and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The evidence at a jury trial shows the following: The victim reported a burglary of his family homeplace after he Officer Johnny Richards of the Gordon County Sheriff's Department responded and found "a station wagon car backed up to the front of the residence." Defendant "was sitting behind the steering wheel on the driver's side." Items found in the defendant's pockets and in the station wagon were identified by the victim as family property which had been removed "[f]rom the residence and the storage building there[,]" without permission or authority. The police recovered "[a] small caliber handgun" from the passenger-side floorboard of defendant's station wagon.
Defendant was found guilty of burglary and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. This appeal followed the denial of defendant's motion for new trial. Held:
1. In his first enumeration, defendant contends the evidence is insufficient to support either conviction. Specifically, he argues that the evidence shows only his mere presence at the scene and that the State did not disprove every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.
" Bankston v. State, 251 Ga. 730, 731, 309 S.E.2d 369. " Williams v. State, 205 Ga.App. 397(1), 422 S.E.2d 438. In the case sub judice, the jury was authorized to disbelieve defendant's explanation for his presence at the scene in possession of the stolen property and also disbelieve his explanation of why a gun was inside his vehicle. See, e.g., Howard v. State, 186 Ga.App. 7, 366 S.E.2d 369. Evidence that defendant was caught "red-handed" with items stolen from the victim's homeplace is sufficient to authorize the jury's finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of burglary as charged in the indictment. Shaw v. State, 211 Ga.App. 647(1), 648, 440 S.E.2d 245. Evidence that a "small caliber handgun" was found on the floor of his vehicle authorized the jury's finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. See Black v. State, 261 Ga. 791, 795(10), 410 S.E.2d 740.
2. In his second enumeration, defendant contends the trial court erred "in failing to grant a new trial because trial counsel was ineffective to the extent that [defendant's] due process rights were violated and he did not receive a fair trial."
Duitsman v. State, 212 Ga.App. 348, 350(4), 441 S.E.2d 888. " Owens v. State, 263 Ga. 99, 102(3), 428 S.E.2d 793.
In the case sub judice, defendant's trial attorney filed a timely motion for new trial on defendant's behalf, but he did not raise the issue of his own ineffectiveness in the motion for new trial. Further, there is no indication in the record that the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel was thereafter raised in the trial court via an amended motion for new trial or by an attorney (other than defendant's trial attorney) at the hearing on defendant's motion for new trial. The record shows only that the trial court entered an order denying defendant's motion for new trial on February 3, 1994, and that, on February 18, 1994, the attorney representing defendant on appeal (not defendant's trial attorney) filed a notice of appeal enumerating (in pertinent part) ineffective assistance of counsel. The State contends this enumeration presents nothing for review because defendant's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. State
...and bag, is sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict. OCGA § 16-7-1(a) (defining crime of burglary); see Abernathy v. State, 214 Ga.App. 364, 365(1), 448 S.E.2d 30 (1994) (jury authorized to disbelieve defendant's explanation of why he was at the scene of the crime in possession of stolen 2......
-
Foster v. State
...entry of the trial court's order is preserved. See Parrish v. State, 194 Ga.App. 760, 762(4) (391 SE2d 797)." Abernathy v. State, 214 Ga.App. 364, 365(2), 366, 448 S.E.2d 30. Judgment affirmed and case remanded with ANDREWS and BLACKBURN, JJ., concur. ...
-
Wilcher v. State
...stolen property is satisfactory or reasonable is a question for the jury." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 214 Ga.App. 364, 365, 448 S.E.2d 30 (1994). The jury was authorized to disbelieve appellant's explanation altogether, or to infer from it that those who traffi......
-
Tate v. State, A02A0542.
...580, 582(2), 459 S.E.2d 557 (1995). 3. Chester v. State, 144 Ga.App. 717-718, 242 S.E.2d 356 (1978). 4. See Abernathy v. State, 214 Ga.App. 364, 365(1), 448 S.E.2d 30 (1994); Shaw v. State, 211 Ga.App. 647, 648-649, 440 S.E.2d 245 5. 183 Ga.App. 110, 357 S.E.2d 845 (1987). 6. 274 Ga. 156, 1......