Duitsman v. State
Decision Date | 09 March 1994 |
Docket Number | No. A93A2504,A93A2504 |
Citation | 212 Ga.App. 348,441 S.E.2d 888 |
Parties | DUITSMAN v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
John R. Burdges, for appellant.
David C. Turk III, Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendant Randy Neil Duitsman was found guilty by a jury of two counts of aggravated assault on a law officer and two counts of felony obstruction of a law officer. He appeals from the conviction and sentences entered by the trial court on the jury's verdicts.
1. In related enumerations, defendant raises the general grounds as to each conviction. Belins v. State, 210 Ga.App. 259(1), 435 S.E.2d 675 (1993).
Viewed in the light to uphold the verdict, the evidence shows that defendant lived with his wife and two children in an old bus next to his brother's trailer. Defendant's sister-in-law summoned the police to break up a domestic disturbance between defendant and his wife. Captain Lowe and Deputy Fortner of the Lumpkin County Sheriff's Department responded. Deputy Fortner was in uniform, and the officers arrived in a marked sheriff's vehicle. As the officers approached, defendant was exiting his brother's trailer, "manhandling the wife ... and children, pushing them towards the bus." A child cried out "He's got a gun!" Deputy Fortner ordered defendant to halt and said that they needed to speak with him. Defendant twice refused Fortner's command to halt and then entered the bus. When the officers asked defendant to come out and talk to them, he refused to come out, shouting, "If you want me, you're going to have to come in and get me!" Captain Lowe shined a flashlight into the bus and saw defendant pointing a pistol at Deputy Fortner. Fortner also saw defendant point the pistol. Defendant then swung around and pointed the gun at Captain Lowe. Deputy Fortner kicked in the folding door of the bus and tackled defendant. They scuffled, during which time defendant kicked Captain Lowe in the hand, causing a severe sprain. Defendant continued to resist until he was forcibly subdued and handcuffed. This version of events was corroborated in a statement given at the scene by defendant's 12-year-old niece, an eyewitness.
Aggravated assault on a peace officer in violation of OCGA § 16-5-21(c) requires proof that the officer was, at the time of the assault, engaged in the performance of his official duties. See Bundren v. State, 247 Ga. 180, 181(2), 274 S.E.2d 455 (1981). Likewise, felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer in violation of OCGA § 16-10-24(b) requires a showing that the officer was acting "in the lawful discharge of his official duties." Defendant argues that his warrantless arrest was without probable cause such that the officers were not acting in the lawful discharge of their official duties. See Wagner v. State, 206 Ga.App. 180, 424 S.E.2d 861 (1992) (physical precedent). However, it is clear that, having been summoned to the scene of a domestic disturbance and having seen defendant forcibly march his family into their dwelling, quite possibly at gunpoint, the officers had probable cause to effectuate a warrantless arrest for a battery constituting a family violence offense as defined by OCGA § 19-13-1(2). OCGA § 17-4-20(a). See also Gilbert v. State, 209 Ga.App. 483, 484-485(2), 433 S.E.2d 664 (1993). The warrantless entry into defendant's home was made in "hot pursuit" since defendant refused Deputy Fortner's command to halt. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Brown v. State, 163 Ga.App. 209, 210(1), 294 S.E.2d 305 (1982). The contention that the officers were not in the lawful discharge of their official duties at the time defendant pointed a gun at each of them and violently resisted arrest is without merit. From the evidence adduced below, a rational trier of fact could reasonably have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of aggravated assault against each of the two law enforcement officers by pointing a pistol as well as felony obstruction of each officer by resisting lawful arrest with violence. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Thus, defendant's enumeration of the general grounds is without merit.
2. Defendant claims that the warrantless post-arrest seizure from his home of the weapon with which he assaulted the officers was unauthorized. However, defendant made no timely written motion to suppress this pistol and the weapon was admitted into evidence without objection. Accordingly, this argument, raised for the first time on appeal, cannot be addressed. "[Defendant] failed to raise a [Fourth Amendment or] due process objection below and this court will not consider issues and grounds for objection, even of constitutional magnitude, which were not raised and determined in the trial court." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Gee v. State, 210 Ga.App. 60, 61(3), 435...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Abernathy v. State, A94A1276
...hearing at the earliest practicable moment.' Ponder v. State, 260 Ga. 840, 841(1) (400 SE2d 922) (1991)." Duitsman v. State, 212 Ga.App. 348, 350(4), 441 S.E.2d 888. " '[W]here the issue of effectiveness is raised for the first time on appeal by an appellate attorney who did not represent t......
-
Phillips v. State
...case for a hearing by the trial court to consider the appellant's assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel. Duitsman v. State, 212 Ga.App. 348, 350, 441 S.E.2d 888 (1994). Judgment affirmed and case remanded with BIRDSONG, P.J., and RUFFIN, J., concur. ...
-
Golden v. State
...a proper basis for cross-examination of Golden regarding her financial interest in the outcome of the trial. Duitsman v. State, 212 Ga.App. 348, 349-350, 441 S.E.2d 888 (1994); Cunningham v. State, 240 Ga.App. 92, 93, 522 S.E.2d 684 Judgment affirmed. PHIPPS and MIKELL, JJ., concur. ...
-
Foster v. State
...to allow the trial court an opportunity to consider defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel." Duitsman v. State, 212 Ga.App. 348, 350(4), 441 S.E.2d 888. "We [further] 'defer the determination of [any] issue of waiver to ... proceedings on remand. See Gary v. State, 260 Ga. 3......