Altena v. Altena, 87-847
| Decision Date | 29 June 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-847,87-847 |
| Citation | 428 N.W.2d 315 |
| Parties | Gail ALTENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Senard ALTENA, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Iowa Court of Appeals |
Michael P. Jacobs of Kindig, Beebe, Rawlings, Nieland, Probasco & Killinger, Sioux City, and Lloyd W. Bierma of Oostra, Bierma & Schouten, Sioux City, for defendant-appellant.
Randall Albert Roos, Sioux Center, for plaintiff-appellee.
Heard by DONIELSON, P.J., and HAYDEN and HABHAB, JJ.
Defendant appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff wherein plaintiff asserted she suffered psychological injury after allegedly being sexually abused by defendant. We dismiss the case.
Plaintiff, Gail Altena, was a twenty-one-year-old student at Dordt College in Sioux Center, Iowa, in the fall of 1982. She rented a basement apartment from the defendant, Senard Altena, who was her father's fifty-five-year-old cousin. Shortly after renting the apartment, plaintiff and defendant became involved in sexual activities. Plaintiff contends the sexual activities were against her will but that she was too confused, naive, immature, and depressed to effectively resist defendant's advances. Defendant contends the sexual activities were consensual. Plaintiff subsequently moved out of the apartment and was hospitalized for depression, emotional distress, and suicidal tendencies, which she asserts were caused by the undesired sexual contact with defendant. Plaintiff filed suit against defendant, and a jury found in favor of plaintiff on her claims of sexual abuse and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant has appealed.
Our scope of review is for the correction of errors at law. Iowa R.App.P. 4. Findings of fact are binding upon us if supported by substantial evidence. Iowa R.App.P. 14(f)(1).
The events which plaintiff alleges caused her injuries occurred in the fall of 1982. Iowa Code section 614.1(2) provides that plaintiff had two years from her injury to file suit. Plaintiff filed this action in March 1986. Defendant contends the district court should have dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds it was not filed within the two-year time limitation period for personal injury torts. However, plaintiff contends she falls under the exception set forth as follows in Iowa Code section 614.8:
The times limited for actions ... shall be extended in favor of ... mentally ill persons, so that they shall have one year from and after the termination of such disability within which to commence said action.
Iowa Code section 4.1(6) defines "mentally ill" as follows:
Mentally ill. The words "mentally ill person" include mental retardates, psychotic persons, severely depressed persons and persons of unsound mind. A person who is hospitalized or detained for treatment of mental illness shall not be deemed or presumed to be incompetent in the absence of a finding of incompetence made pursuant to § 229.27.
The jury instruction given in this case set forth only the first sentence of section 4.1(6).
The district court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment, motion for directed verdict, and motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. The court held that a genuine issue of material fact existed concerning the availability of the "mental illness exception" to the statute of limitations. The jury found that plaintiff had been mentally ill from the time of the sexual abuse until less than a year before her suit was filed, thus having the effect of concluding that the lawsuit was timely filed.
In his appeal defendant does not argue about the weight of the evidence, but argues there was no evidence to submit to the jury the question of whether plaintiff was mentally ill. Defendant concedes plaintiff may have been depressed and suicidal, but argues there was no evidence to show plaintiff was "severely depressed" as that term is used in Iowa Code section 4.1(6) and the given jury instruction or that she lacked legal competence; defendant further asserts no expert ever testified plaintiff was mentally ill nor was there such an adjudication.
In Dautremont v. Broadlawns Hospital, 827 F.2d 291, 296 (8th Cir.1987), ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Whatcott v. Whatcott
...156, 159-60 (Ct.App.1988); Bock, 526 So.2d at 297. See also J.D. v. M.F., 758 S.W.2d 177, 178 (Mo.Ct.App.1988); Altena v. Altena, 428 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Iowa Ct.App.1988). We cannot conclude that the trial court's grant of summary judgment was GARFF and JACKSON, JJ., concur. 1 Plaintiff's com......
-
Langner v. Simpson
...under a legal disability for any purpose including ... [section] 614.8 [the tolling statute]. Id. at 296; see also Altena v. Altena, 428 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Iowa Ct.App.1988) (holding that there was no evidence to support finding that woman who had sued cousin for damages resulting from allege......
-
Borchard v. Anderson
...to section 229.27. The issue whether a person is mentally ill for purposes of the tolling statute is factual. Altena v. Altena, 428 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Iowa App.1988). We think the record here demonstrates as a matter of law that Iowa Code section 614.8 does not apply. Although plaintiff has b......
-
Bergstrom v. Iowa Health System, No. 7-088/06-1053 (Iowa App. 8/22/2007)
...issue of whether a person is mentally ill is factual. Borchard v. Anderson, 542 N.W.2d 247, 249 (Iowa 1996) (citing Altena v. Altena, 428 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Iowa Ct. App. 1988)). We conclude the issue of whether a person's physical and mental condition was such as to prevent the person from k......