Appeal of City of Concord

Decision Date29 April 1983
Docket NumberNo. 81-339,81-339
Citation123 N.H. 256,459 A.2d 285
Parties, 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3295 Appeal of CITY OF CONCORD (Public Employee Labor Relations Board).
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Paul F. Cavanaugh, City Sol., Concord, by brief and orally, for City of Concord.

Cleveland, Waters & Bass, Concord (Howard J. Zibel, Concord, on brief and orally), for Local No. 1045, Intern. Ass'n of Firefighters.

BATCHELDER, Justice.

The City of Concord (city) brings this appeal pursuant to RSA chapter 541, challenging a decision of the Public Employee Labor Relations Board (PELRB) which approved the inclusion of battalion chiefs in bargaining Unit B of Local No. 1045 of the International Association of Firefighters. We affirm.

Local No. 1045 of the Concord Fire Department is comprised of two bargaining units: Unit A, representing rank-and-file personnel, and Unit B, representing supervisory personnel. The division of the union local into two separate bargaining units is necessary because although public employees having supervisory authority may be represented by a union, they may not belong to the same bargaining unit as those employees over whom they exercise such authority. RSA 273-A:8, II; see City of Concord v. PELRB, 119 N.H. 725, 726, 407 A.2d 363, 363-64 (1979).

In November 1980, Local No. 1045 petitioned the PELRB for a modification of the membership of Unit B so as to include the three new battalion chiefs whose position had been created as a result of a recent fire department reorganization. The reorganization had eliminated the post of deputy chief and the battalion chiefs were the same personnel who, prior to the reorganization, had been deputy chiefs. The position of assistant fire chief, who aids the chief of the department in certain administrative duties, was also created at this time. Formerly, deputy chiefs, by choice, had not been part of either bargaining unit of Local No. 1045; however, after the reorganization, the battalion chiefs requested union representation.

The city opposed the proposed membership of battalion chiefs within Unit B, contending that battalion chiefs exercise such supervisory authority over the other personnel within that unit that their inclusion in Unit B would violate RSA 273-A:8, II. After a hearing, the PELRB on May 1, 1981, issued a unanimous decision approving the union's petition to include battalion chiefs within bargaining Unit B. The city's request for a rehearing was denied, and it brought this appeal.

The PELRB is vested with authority to define and interpret the terms and provisions of RSA chapter 273-A in the first instance. Appeal of State Employees Ass'n, 120 N.H. 690, 694, 422 A.2d 1301, 1304 (1980). Implicit in this authority is the PELRB's discretion to delineate which employees are "supervisory...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Appeal of University System of New Hampshire
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1988
    ...supervise." The legislature has vested the PELRB with primary authority to define the term "supervisory," Appeal of City of Concord, 123 N.H. 256, 257, 459 A.2d 285, 286 (1983); N.H. Dept. of Rev. Administration v. Public Emp. Lab. Rel. Bd., 117 N.H. at 978, 380 A.2d at 1086, and requires t......
  • Appeal of Manchester Bd. of School Committee, 86-053
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1987
    ...the terms of RSA chapter 273-A. Appeal of Town of Pelham, 124 N.H. 131, 134, 469 A.2d 1295, 1297 (1983); Appeal of City of Concord, 123 N.H. 256, 257, 459 A.2d 285, 286 (1983). However, it is well-established that "this court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expresse......
  • Appeal of Westmoreland School Bd., 88-213
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • August 9, 1989
    ...1297 (1983), and the PELRB's findings upon questions of fact are deemed prima facie lawful and reasonable, Appeal of City of Concord, 123 N.H. 256, 257, 459 A.2d 285, 286 (1983). In their briefs, both parties agree that arbitration should be ordered "unless it may be said with positive assu......
  • Appeal of Town of Pelham
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1983
    ...has vested the PELRB with initially defining and interpreting the terms and provisions of RSA chapter 273-A. Appeal of City of Concord, 123 N.H. 256, 257, 459 A.2d 285, 286 (1983); Appeal of State Employees Ass'n, 120 N.H. 690, 694, 422 A.2d 1301, 1304 (1980). Implicit in this authority is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT