Asher v. Abbott Laboratories
| Decision Date | 03 January 2002 |
| Parties | AARON ASHER et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Private persons cannot bring a class action under the Donnelly Act because the treble damages remedy provided in General Business Law § 340 (5) is a "penalty" within the meaning of CPLR 901 (b), the recovery of which in a class action is not specifically authorized and the imposition of which cannot be waived (Rubin v Nine W. Group, 1999 NY Misc LEXIS 655, *10-14, 1999 WL 1425364, *4-5 [Sup Ct, Westchester County, John DiBlasi, J.]; Russo & Dubin v Allied Maintenance Corp., 95 Misc 2d 344, 348-349 [Sup Ct, NY County, Hilda Schwartz, J., 1978]; Blumenthal v American Socy. of Travel Agents, 1977 WL 18392, *3 [Sup Ct, NY County, Arnold Fein, J.]; see also, McLaughlin, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C901:7; Cox v Microsoft Corp., 290 AD2d 206 [decided herewith]). We note the specific authorization to bring class actions on behalf of governmental entities given to the Attorney General in General Business Law § 342-b, the absence of such specific authorization in section 340 (6), and the enactment of the latter provision after two courts (Blumenthal, supra; Russo & Dubin, supra) had held that class actions could not be brought under the Donnelly Act because not specifically authorized (see, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes §§ 74, 240, 363). The conclusion that treble damages under the Donnelly Act are penal in nature is not undermined by the fact that they are mandatory, i.e., not discretionary or contingent upon a finding of bad faith, and indeed it can be argued that a statute providing for an award of multiple damages without need to prove willfulness or bad faith is more punitive than one that does require such proof.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs., P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 08–1008.
...Rules, so its enactments, unlike those of the States, prevail even in case of a conflict.5 But see, e.g., Asher v. Abbott Labs., 290 App. Div.2d 208, 737 N.Y.S.2d 4 (2002) (treble damages under N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340(5) are nonwaivable, wherefore class actions under that law are barred).6......
-
Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs., P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 08–1008.
...enactments, unlike those of the States, prevail even in case of a conflict.5 But see, e.g., Asher v. Abbott Labs., 290 App. Div.2d 208, 737 N.Y.S.2d 4 (2002) (treble damages under N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340(5) are nonwaivable, wherefore class actions under that law are barred).6 Our decision ......
-
Leider v. Ralfe
...a class action...." Cox v. Microsoft Corp., 290 A.D.2d 206, 737 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2 (1st Dep't 2002) ("Cox I"5); Asher v. Abbott Labs., 290 A.D.2d 208, 737 N.Y.S.2d 4, 4 (1st Dep't 2002) (same); accord Giovanniello v. Hispanic Media Group USA, Inc., 4 Misc.3d 440, 780 N.Y.S.2d 720, 722 (2004); Ru......
-
Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P., Index No. 603468/2009
...8 A.D.3d 39, 40 (1st Dep't 2004). Unlike mandatory treble damages provisions that bar class certification, e.g., Asher v. Abbott Labs., 290 A.D.2d 208 (1st Dep't 2002) (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340(5)), the treble damages provisions in Administrative Code §§ 26-413(d)(2) and 26-516(a) and 9N.Y.......
-
Table of Cases
...826 F.2d 1335 (3d Cir. 1987), 157 Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 786 F.2d 564 (3d Cir. 1986), 104 Asher v. Abbott Labs., 737 N.Y.S.2d 4 (App. Div. 2002), 33 Assam Drug Co. v. Miller Brewing Co., 798 F.2d 311 (8th Cir. 1986), 21, 119 Associated Gen. Contractors v. Cal. State ......
-
The Antitrust Laws: An Overview
...161, at 6-38. 184. N.Y. GEN. BUS. LAW § 340(6). 185. 2 STATE ANTITRUST PRACTICE, supra note 161, at 35-1. 186. See Asher v. Abbott Labs., 737 N.Y.S.2d 4, 5 (App. Div. 2002); Cox v. Microsoft Corp., 737 N.Y.S.2d 1, 2 (App. Div. 2002). 34 Antitrust Handbook for Franchise and Distribution Prac......
-
New York. Practice Text
...both civil and criminal investigations into antitrust violations “whenever he believes it is 411. See, e.g., Asher v. Abbott Labs., 737 N.Y.S.2d 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002); Cox v. Microsoft Corp., 737 N.Y.S.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002); see generally Lennon , 734 N.Y.S.2d at 378 (noting that the......
-
Appendix A. Survey Of State Indirect Purchaser Jurisprudence and Legislation
...not a Donnelly Act case), and cases cited therein; for an older, Donnelly Act decision to the contrary, see Asher v. Abbott Laboratories, 737 N.Y.S.2d 4, 5 (App. Div. 2002). 241 . See In re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litig., 779 F. Supp. 2d 642, 659-61 (E.D. Mich. 2011), applying Shady Grove Or......