Bakery Salvage Corp. v. City of Lackawanna

Decision Date24 April 1969
Parties, 249 N.E.2d 438 BAKERY SALVAGE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF LACKAWANNA, Respondent, and Town of West Seneca, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

George M. Zimmermann, Buffalo, for Bakery Salvage Corp., appellant.

Andrew C. Hilton, Jr., West Seneca for Town of West Seneca, appellant.

Samuel P. Simon, Corp. Counsel (John J. Olszewski, Buffalo, of counsel), for respondent.

BERGAN, Judge.

The ordinance of the City of Lackawanna challenged by plaintiff restricts the size of trucks operating on a residential street to five tons (10,000 pounds). The street is very narrow, from 18 to 20 feet in width, making the passage of most motor vehicles difficult. It has no sidewalks and children play extensively there. The general city area where the street is located is residential and has been so zoned for many years.

Plaintiff's trucks, weighing from 26,000 to 28,000 pounds loaded (almost three times the size permitted by the ordinance), have extensively used the residential street. They are 33 feet long and 11 feet high. A witness described one of the tractor-trailers as covering half the pavement of the street.

The record discloses an attribution of damage to private homes by cracking and a deterioration in the city street due to this heavy usage. The residential community became so disturbed by plaintiff's trucks that a picket of neighborhood adults and children was established on the street to attempt to stop the heavy traffic. A 'huge chain of people' blocked the street. They 'just wanted the trucks gone'.

The general power of the city to enact a reasonable ordinance to control the weight and size of vehicles on streets is beyond all doubt. It is not only an authority granted specifically by paragraph 5 of subdivision (a) of section 1640 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, Consol. Laws, c. 71, but it has been regarded as a normal municipal power in the Local Governments article of the New York Constitution (art. IX), in the City Home Rule Law, and in numerous city charters.

The Vehicle and Traffic Law, when certain truck routes have been designated, authorizes the city to exclude heavy traffic from 'all' other streets, whether residential or not (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1640, subd. (a), par. 10). The City of Lackawanna has designated and laid out such truck routes.

Thus, the uniform rule is that on its face the ordinance here challenged must be deemed valid (Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 52 S.Ct. 581, 76 L.Ed. 1167; Fifth Ave. Coach Co. v. City of New York, 221 U.S. 467, 31 S.Ct. 709, 55 L.Ed. 815, affg. 194 N.Y. 19, 86 N.E. 824; Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of New York, 5 N.Y.2d 110, 180 N.Y.S.2d 769, 154 N.E.2d 814; Wiggins v. Town of Somers, 4 N.Y.2d 215, 173 N.Y.S.2d 579, 149 N.E.2d 869; Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown, 302 N.Y. 115, 96 N.E.2d 731; Shepard v. Village of Skaneateles, 300 N.Y. 115, 89 N.E.2d 619; Jones Beach Blvd. Estate v. Moses, 268 N.Y. 362, 197 N.E. 313; People ex rel. Wineburgh Adv. Co. v. Murphy, 195 N.Y. 126, 88 N.E. 17; Sauer v. City of New York, 180 N.Y. 27, 72 N.E. 579; Deshong v. City of New York, 176 N.Y. 475, 68 N.E. 880; cf. Tubular Serv. Corp. v. Commissioner of State Highway Dept., 77 N.J.Super. 556, 187 A.2d 201, affd. 40 N.J. 331, 191 A.2d 745).

Plaintiff's rights are not inconsequential, but in balancing interests and policy they do not reach the level where, because of inconvenience or some difficulty, the truck owner's claims on the court should override the safety of residents and the reasonable regulations of a city designed to promote the public safety.

Plaintiff has a substantial plant investment in the Town of West Seneca. But it selected and paid a modest amount for the site at a time when it was perfectly apparent that the Thruway would cut off access except through the City of Lackawanna's residential street and when it was equally...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Burns, 1
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • January 11, 1979
    ...The state may also reasonably regulate the weight of vehicles using its highways. Bakery Salvage Corp. v. City of Lackawanna, 24 N.Y.2d 643, 301 N.Y.S.2d 581, 249 N.E.2d 438 (1969), modified, 24 N.Y.2d 1025, 302 N.Y.S.2d 845, 250 N.E.2d 247 (1969), and may even impose upon its citizens a ma......
  • Peconic Ave. Businessmens' Ass'n v. Town of Brookhaven
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 19, 1983
    ...over designated streets is beyond doubt (see Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1660, subd. [a], par. 17; Bakery Salvage Corp. v. City of Lackawanna, 24 N.Y.2d 643, 301 N.Y.S.2d 581, 249 N.E.2d 438; 7 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations [3d ed], § 24.616). The ordinance, valid on its face, carries wi......
  • Ricketts v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1999
    ...as part of its police powers the authority to regulate the public streets. VTL § 1640(a)(5); Bakery Salvage Corp. v. City of Lackawanna, 24 N.Y.2d 643, 301 N.Y.S.2d 581, 249 N.E.2d 438 (1969). In its newly granted power allowing the City to regulate van services under Local Law 115, the Cit......
  • City of Rye v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 24, 1969
    ... ... Turner & Blanchard, 267 N.Y. 207, 196 N.E. 28; Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N.Y. 304, 165 N.E. 456; Eidelberg v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • 19.10 B. Subdivision Maps
    • United States
    • New York State Bar Association Real Estate Titles (NY) Chapter 19 Title To Land In Beds of Streets and Highways
    • Invalid date
    ...2d 975, 265 N.Y.S.2d 471 (Sup. Ct., Erie Co. 1965), rev’d on other grounds, 30 A.D.2d 207, 291 N.Y.S.2d 104 (4th Dep’t 1968), aff’d, 24 N.Y.2d 643, 301 N.Y.S.2d 581, remittitur, 24 N.Y.2d 1025, 302 N.Y.S.2d 845 (1969); Carman v. Hewitt, 105 N.Y.S.2d 239 (Sup. Ct., Suffolk Co. 1951), modifie......
  • 19.1 II. Definitions
    • United States
    • New York State Bar Association Real Estate Titles (NY) Chapter 19 Title To Land In Beds of Streets and Highways
    • Invalid date
    ...2d 975, 265 N.Y.S.2d 471 (Sup. Ct., Erie Co. 1965), rev’d on other grounds, 30 A.D.2d 207, 291 N.Y.S.2d 104 (4th Dep’t 1968), aff’d, 24 N.Y.2d 643, 301 N.Y.S.2d 581 (1969).[3316] . People v. County of Westchester, 282 N.Y. 224 (1940). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT