Beard v. State, 52397
| Decision Date | 21 January 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 52397,52397 |
| Citation | 392 So.2d 1143 |
| Parties | Zebbie D. BEARD v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Patricia A. Catchings, Jackson, for appellant.
Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.
Zebbie D. Beard was tried in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County upon an indictment charging him with aggravated assault upon one Fletcher. He was convicted of that offense and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment with five years suspended on supervised probation.
The incident out of which the prosecution arose occurred in a bar following an argument between Beard and Fletcher. According to Beard's version, Fletcher had taunted him verbally and then had "jumped up", started around the bar toward him with his hand in his pocket and Beard thought Fletcher might be armed as Fletcher was "known to cut people up". Fletcher, on the other hand, testified that he had not been armed and had made no attack on Beard. Fletcher said that Beard came out of the rest room and started shooting at him as he sat at the bar. They struggled for the gun and Beard's "friend" threw Fletcher on a table where Beard continued to shoot him. Fletcher was shot nine times.
The only assignment of error is that the trial judge erred by failing to accept Beard's guilty plea which he alleges he had tried three times to enter.
The record indicates that prior to trial, in the course of plea bargaining with the district attorney, the latter had offered to recommend, in the event Beard should plead guilty, that Beard be sentenced to twenty years imprisonment with all but two years suspended.
Before the trial began, the trial judge explained Beard's rights to him and the possible consequences of a trial and conviction. When the trial judge had concluded and Beard was asked if he had a valid defense or if he wished to plead guilty he told the court "I'm not guilty".
On that statement, the trial proceeded until the state had rested. At that point, Beard indicated that he wished to pled guilty. The trial judge renewed his interrogation of Beard as to his guilt or innocence and as to the consequences of a conviction. Beard persisted in saying that he desired to plead guilty and, as he expressed it, "take the two years".
The court explained to Beard that the court could not accept a plea of guilty so long as Beard continued to deny that he was guilty and to maintain that he was innocent.
Beard persisted in saying that he was not guilty but wanted to plead guilty and "take the two years". With the utmost patience the trial judge persevered and did everything within reason to make clear to Beard that, if he insisted that he was not guilty, a guilty plea could not be accepted. Beard refused to deviate from his insistence that he was not guilty because, he said, he had acted in self defense, but he again expressed a desire to plead guilty and "take the two years". This stalemate continued unchanged through innumerable repetitions and, despite the efforts of the trial judge, the impasse could not be resolved. Thereupon the trial was resumed.
The verdict of the jury finding Beard guilty is amply supported by the evidence and its sufficiency is not challenged on appeal.
The trial court committed no error in declining to accept a plea of guilty from a defendant who adamantly maintained that he was innocent.
In Williamson v. State, 388 So.2d 168 (Miss.1980), this Court dealt with a similar situation,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bennett v. State, No. 2003-DP-00765-SCT.
...that it is nothing more than "`an ambiguous expression of qualified guilt coupled with a protestation of innocence.'" Beard v. State, 392 So.2d 1143, 1145 (Miss.1981) (quoting Hulsey v. United States, 369 F.2d 284, 287 (5th Cir.1966)). See Alford, 400 U.S. at 38, 91 S.Ct. 160 (guilty pleas ......
-
Wade v. State
...the defendants have either asserted viable defenses or insisted on their innocence." Moody, 716 So.2d at 594. See, e.g., Beard v. State, 392 So.2d 1143 (Miss.1981)(finding the trial court acted within its sound discretion in rejecting a defendant's guilty plea where he continued to proclaim......
-
Young v. Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Co., WC 86-11-LS-D.
... ... and operated by one of its employees experienced mechanical difficulties while traveling on a state highway. The truck came to a halt, partially blocking both lanes of traffic. The car in which ... ...
-
Moody v. State, IA-00285-SCT
...to accept guilty pleas where the defendants have either asserted viable defenses or insisted on their innocence. See, e.g., Beard v. State, 392 So.2d 1143 (Miss.1981) (finding the trial court acted within its sound discretion in rejecting a defendant's guilty plea where he continued to proc......