Briggs v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 13384

Decision Date08 November 1984
Docket NumberNo. 13384,13384
PartiesPaul L. BRIGGS and Cindy Briggs, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Lloyd G. Briggs, Briggs & Briggs, Sikeston, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Donald L. Dickerson, Jeffrey S. Maguire, Thomasson, Dickerson, Gilbert & Cook, Cape Girardeau, for defendant-respondent.

TITUS, Judge.

Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company by its policy issued June 20, 1980, insured a house owned by plaintiffs, husband and wife. Exactly four months thereafter or on October 20, 1980, there was a fire at the premises. The fire was said to have been set by a burglar-arsonist who allegedly possessed a key to the house and who perished in the flames. Defendant paid plaintiffs some $32,000 because of fire damage to the property. Included in that figure was a $3,000 allowance on plaintiffs' claim for lost rent. Defendant refused plaintiffs' claim for fire damage to personal property. This prompted plaintiffs to sue for personal property damage, vexatious refusal to pay and for attorney fees. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant at the conclusion of plaintiffs' evidence and plaintiffs appealed.

As pertinent here, the policy provided: "COVERAGE B--PERSONAL PROPERTY ... Property Not Covered. We do not cover: ... 7. property regularly rented or held for rental to others by any insured, except property of an insured in a sleeping room rented to another by an insured."

At the time of the fire plaintiff Paul Briggs, son of Lloyd G. Briggs, Sr. and Juanita Briggs, was incarcerated in a federal penitentiary and had been so incarcerated for an extended period of time prior thereto. Plaintiff Cindy Briggs, wife of Paul, was pregnant at the time of her husband's incarceration and near the commencement of the imprisonment left the insured house and moved in with her in-laws.

Juanita Briggs testified that she rented the house furnished, in part, to Bob Scanlon on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rental of $250. He was given a key to the house. Mrs. Briggs recounted "I think [Scanlon] rented it in July ... but maybe it was August" 1980. Scanlon continued renting until the October fire. In addition to the cash rental, Scanlon "was to take care of the yard; he was to water the trees that we had just planted, some 15 or 20 fruit trees ... and he was to keep everything neat and clean." Scanlon "was to have the light bill put in his name" and was to have use of the TV room (converted by Mrs. Briggs into a bedroom), the kitchen and the living room. Although not expressly mentioned in the testimony, it appears that of necessity Scanlon would also have use of a bathroom in the leased house.

In its ordinary sense the word "room" means a single enclosure separated by partitions or other means from the other parts of a house or building. State v. Barge, 82 Minn. 256, 84 N.W. 911, 913, 53 L.R.A. 428 (1901); 77 C.J.S. Room, pp. 538-539; Webster's Third New...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Antioch Cmty. Church v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Kan. City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 2018
    ...or motorized component, therefore, cannot preclude a sign from being of the monument sign type. See Briggs v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 680 S.W.2d 444, 445 (Mo. App. 1984) ("An adjective modifies a noun to denote a quality of the thing named, or to indicate its quantity or extent.") (emph......
  • Appeal of McKee
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • April 28, 1989
    ...a single enclosure separated by partitions or other means from the other parts of a house or building." Briggs v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 680 S.W.2d 444, 445 (Mo.App.1984). "A room is defined ... as 'a space for occupancy or use enclosed on all sides, as in a building; an apartment; f......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Baker
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1990
    ...plain meaning, and, if the language is unambiguous, the policy must be enforced according to such language. Briggs v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 680 S.W.2d 444, 445 (Mo.App.1984). Missouri courts follow a construction favorable to the insured wherever the language of a policy is susceptibl......
  • Eagle Star Ins. Co. of America v. Family Fun, Inc., WD
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 11, 1989
    ...plain meaning and if the language is unambiguous the policy must be enforced according to such language." Briggs v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 680 S.W.2d 444, 445 (Mo.App.1984) (citing Robin v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc., 637 S.W.2d 695, 698 (Mo. banc 1982); McGarrah v. Stockton, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT