Brindley v. Krizman
| Decision Date | 31 October 1963 |
| Citation | 244 N.Y.S.2d 779,13 N.Y.2d 976 |
| Parties | , 194 N.E.2d 688 Dorothy R. BRINDLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Istav KRIZSAN et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Motor Vehicle Accident indemnification Corporation, Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 18 A.D.2d 971, 238 N.Y.S.2d 260.
Action for judgment declaring whether Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation or automobile owner and his insurer should meet and defend claim of plaintiffWho was injured when driver to whom borrower of automobile loaned vehicle was driving.
The Supreme Court, New York County, Henry Clay Greenberg, J., rendered judgment for plaintiffs, and an appeal was taken.
The Appellate Division (Steuer, J., dissenting) affirmed, holding that evidence supported finding that unlicensed driver to whom borrower loaned automobile was driving with implied consent of owner when plaintiff was injured, and a further appeal was taken.
Hohn J. O'Connor, New York City (James M. Gilleran, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
Heffner, Block & Block, New York City (Frederick H. Block, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.
Robert G. Sheller, New York City (Leonard Hemley, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-respondent M.V.A.I.C.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. LaPerta
...N.Y.2d 449, 461, 209 N.Y.S.2d 304, 312, 171 N.E.2d 454, 459; Brindley v. Kirzsan, 18 A.D.2d 971, 238 N.Y.S.2d 260, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 976, 244 N.Y.S.2d 779, 194 N.E.2d 688).' We then went on to say (37 A.D.2d pp. 477--478, 326 N.Y.S.2d pp. 679--680): 'Finally, we must treat the circumstances o......
-
Bank v. Rebold
...449, 461, (209 N.Y.S.2d 304, 312, 171 N.E.2d 454, 459); Brindley v. Kirzsan, 18 A.D.2d 971, 238 N.Y.S.2d 260, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 976, 244 N.Y.S.2d 779, 194 N.E.2d 688)." Accordingly, it was incumbent on plaintiff to demonstrate initially that Avis was the owner-lessor of the Volkswagen driven ......
-
Watson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...owed a defense and/or coverage under the policy" (see also, Brindley v. Krizsan, 18 A.D.2d 971, 238 N.Y.S.2d 260, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 976, 244 N.Y.S.2d 779, 194 N.E.2d 688; De Abreu v. Lumbermans Mut. Cas. Co., 32 Misc.2d 634, 223 N.Y.S.2d 953; Curreri v. Allstate Ins. Co., 37 Misc.2d 557, 236 ......
-
Wagman v. Hooper
...1, affd. 6 N.Y.3d 881, 817 N.Y.S.2d 210, 850 N.E.2d 25 ; Brindley v. Krizsan, 18 A.D.2d 971, 238 N.Y.S.2d 260, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 976, 244 N.Y.S.2d 779, 194 N.E.2d 688 ), neither that statute nor the defendant's license suspension affect the school district's obligation to indemnify the defend......