Brodheim v. Rowland
Decision Date | 13 May 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 91-16856,91-16856 |
Citation | 993 F.2d 716 |
Parties | Michael Josef BRODHEIM, Petitioner-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND, Director, California Department of Corrections; Ron Koenig, Respondents-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Michael Josef Brodheim, in pro per.
Catherine A. McBrien, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, CA, for respondents-appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before: BROWNING, CHOY and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The district court ruled California's statutory scheme for providing work credits to convicted murderers violates the equal protection clause. Brodheim v. Rowland, 783 F.Supp. 1245 (N.D.Cal.1991). The court's interpretation of California law was expressly repudiated by In re Singer, 13 Cal.App.4th 1755, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 395 (6th Dist.1993). "We are bound by that state court's construction of its own penal statute," McSherry v. Block, 880 F.2d 1049, 1052 (9th Cir.1989), and may re-examine a state court's interpretation of its own law only if "the court's interpretation is untenable or amounts to a subterfuge to avoid federal review of a constitutional violation." Taylor v. Kincheloe, 920 F.2d 599, 609 (9th Cir.1990) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Ward v. Love County, 253 U.S. 17, 22, 40 S.Ct. 419, 421, 64 L.Ed. 751 (1920). Singer § interpretation of California law is straightforward and reasonable. There is no evidence of subterfuge.
Brodheim challenges the district court's ruling that he has no due process right to continue earning one-for-one work credits under Cal.Penal Code § 2933. See 783 F.Supp. at 1248. Brodheim has already received credit for his work prior to In re Monigold, 205 Cal.App.3d 1224, 253 Cal.Rptr. 120 (4th Dist.1988) ( ). Section 2933 does not create a liberty interest in work credits for inmates who have not engaged in any work that would entitle them to such credits. Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080, 1095 (9th Cir.1986). Being ineligible for the program under state law, Brodheim has no due process right to continue earning credits under § 2933. Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 250, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1748, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983) ( ).
We affirm the district court's denial of Brodheim's due process claim, but vacate the judgment of the district court with respect to Brodheim's equal protection claim. We remand for further proceedings...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morgan v. Robinson, SACV 00-0434-AHS(RC).
...493 U.S. 942, 110 S.Ct. 344, 107 L.Ed.2d 332 (1989)); Mullaney, 421 U.S. at 691 n. 11, 95 S.Ct. at 1886 n. 11; Brodheim v. Rowland, 993 F.2d 716, 717 (9th Cir.1993). The petitioner contends the California Court of Appeal's interpretation of P.C. § 653f(c) is untenable because, when P.C. § 6......
-
People v. Jenkins
...district court decision, Brodheim v. Rowland (N.D.Cal.1991) 783 F.Supp. 1245 (affd. in part and vacated in part in Brodheim v. Rowland (9th Cir.1993) 993 F.2d 716). 6 As a result of the Brodheim decision, it appeared that, although the Legislature generally had not extended worktime credits......
-
Marrs v. California
...court is bound by a decision by the California intermediate court of appeals interpreting state law. Id., citing Broadheim v. Rowland, 993 F.2d 716, 717 (9th Cir. 1993) (finding that federal court could only "re-examine a state court's interpretation of its own law...if 'the court's interpr......
-
People v. Jenkins, H011009
...147, 283 Cal.Rptr. 422 and Brodheim v. Rowland (N.D.Cal.1991) 783 F.Supp. 1245, affd. in part and vacated in part in Brodheim v. Rowland (9th Cir.1993) 993 F.2d 716.) In the instant case, the trial court reimposed the life term under section 667.7 for the murder count. For the assault charg......