Cadoux v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Weston
Decision Date | 08 February 1972 |
Citation | 162 Conn. 425,54 A.L.R.3d 1278,294 A.2d 582 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | , 54 A.L.R.3d 1278 Edmond CADOUX v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF WESTON. |
Melvin J. Silverman, Norwalk, with whom, on the brief, was Max R. Lepofsky, Norwalk, for appellant (plaintiff).
Robert M. Wechsler, Stamford, with whom were Bernard Glazer, Stamford, and, on the brief, Harvey J. Rothberg, Stamford, for appellee (defendant).
Before HOUSE, C.J., and THIM, RYAN, SHAPIRO and LOISELLE, JJ.
On May 17, 1967, the plaintiff filed an application with the defendant commission for an amendment of the zoning regulations establishing a town shopping center district. The proposed amendment would authorize the use of property within the proposed district for stores and other buildings where goods are sold or service is rendered primarily at retail, business and professional offices, banks and other financial institutions, restaurants and other food service establishments where customers are served only when seated and within an enclosed building, including a food takeout service incidental to the primary permitted use. The application was denied and the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, where the appeal was dismissed. From the judgment rendered thereon he has appealed to this court.
The plaintiff's principal claim of error is that the zoning regulations of the town of Weston purport to bar from within the town the use of property for the conduct of ordinary commercial activities unless such activities consist of farming or can be considered customary home occupations. The plaintiff urges that since there is only one district for the entire town the regulations are illegal and arbitrary.
The zoning regulations of the town of Weston as amended to August 21, 1967, provide, in pertinent part, as follows: In § 4 of the regulations the following uses are permitted: A single-family dwelling house, offices of a physician, dentist, attorney-at-law, engineer, architect, teacher, artist, musician, writer, photographer, real estate agent, insurance agent, or accountant, or services rendered by a dressmaker, milliner, home cook plumber, electrician, or home repair or serviceman. The use shall be located in the same building in which the resident occupants reside. It also permits the leasing of rooms and the taking of boarders by owner-occupants, farming, nursery gardening, truck gardening and the incidental display and sale of farm produce raised on the premises, removal from the premises of earth materials as part of a bona fide construction or grading operation, and certain special uses.
The testimony of a professional planner appearing at the public hearing on the application on behalf of the plaintiff indicated that the town of Weston is 19.9 square miles in area and has a population of approximately 6700. Weston is a residential community and is so located that there is a general orientation of Weston residents toward the town of Westport, the southwestern region of Connecticut and the city of New York, for employment, shopping and other services. The town has been developed by the construction of single-family houses on lots of two or more acres. The town of Weston has no public water supply, sanitary sewers or public transportation. Its function in the southwestern region of Connecticut is that of a residential area for single-family homes in a rural...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.
...so arbitrary and unreasonable as in every case to be invalid.' 221 F.2d at p. 418. See also Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning Com'n of Town of Weston (1972) 162 Conn. 425, 428, 294 A.2d 582, 583--584; Jameson v. St. Tammany Parish Policy Jury, (La.App.), supra, 225 So.2d 720, 724; Town of Plainfi......
-
Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise Valley
...Use. Cases cited upholding such limited residential zoning classification are Cadoux v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of Weston, 162 Conn. 425, 294 A.2d 582, 54 A.L.R.3d 1278 (1972), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 924, 92 S.Ct. 2496, 33 L.Ed.2d 335 (1972); McDermott v. Calverton Park, 454 ......
-
Town of Beacon Falls v. Posick
...related to the protection of the municipalities' public safety, health and general welfare. See, e.g., Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 162 Conn. 425, 428-29, 294 A.2d 582, cert. denied, 408 U.S. 924, 92 S.Ct. 2496, 33 L.Ed.2d 335 (1972) (prohibition on all uses except residential us......
-
Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Furlong
... ... ' bargaining agent shall be filed with the town clerk and '(t)he terms of such contract shall be ... v. Water Resources Commission, 162 Conn. 89, 100, 291 A.2d 721; Klapproth v ... ...