Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital
Decision Date | 15 July 2003 |
Citation | 829 A.2d 419,265 Conn. 902 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | MOHINDER P. CHADHA v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL ET AL. |
Jeffrey R. Babbin, in support of the petition.
Mohinder P. Chadha, pro se, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 104 (AC 22395), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) a denial of a motion for summary judgment, filed on the basis of absolute immunity, is a final judgment for purposes of appeal; and (2) the trial court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17029.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp.
...Conn.App. 104, 122, 822 A.2d 303 (2003). We granted the defendants' petition for certification to appeal; Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, 265 Conn. 902, 829 A.2d 419 (2003); and now affirm the judgment of the Appellate The following relevant facts and procedural history are set for......
- Digital 60 & 80 Merritt, LLC v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals of the Town of Trumbull
- National Amusements v. TOWN OF EAST WINDSOR
- Fairfield Merrittview Ltd. P'ship v. City of Norwalk
-
2003 Connecticut Appellate Review
...discussion reaches only a portion of those cases that caught the authors' attention. 89 77 Conn. App. 107, 824 A.2d 857, cert. granted, 265 Conn. 902, 829 A.2d 419 (2003). 90 Id. at 106-07. 91 Id. at 121. 92 Id. at 122-24 (Landau, J., dissenting). The trial court had denied the defendants' ......