Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co.
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Arbitration proceedings in which the Supreme Court at Special Term, New York County, Samuel Gold |
| Citation | Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co., 18 N.Y.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 382 (N.Y. 1966) |
| Decision Date | 20 October 1966 |
| Parties | , 221 N.E.2d 913 In the Matter of the Arbitration of Controversies by and among CHARIOT TEXTILES CORP., Appellant, and WANNALANCIT TEXTILE CO., Respondent, and Kute Kiddies Coats, Inc., et al., Respondents. |
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 21 A.D.2d 762, 250 N.Y.S.2d 493.
Hahn, Hessen, Margolis & Ryan, New York City (Jules J. L. Hessen, Warren M. Weitzman and Melvin Beinart, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-respondent.
Arbitration proceedings in which the Supreme Court at Special Term, New York County, Samuel Gold, J., entered an order consolidating three arbitration proceedings and an appeal was taken.
The Appellate Division reversed on ground that the Special Term lacked power to consolidate the three proceedings in absence of action pending, and an appeal was taken.
Order of the Appellate...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Keating v. Superior Court
... ... requirements of the Franchise Investment Law (Corp. Code, § 31000 et seq.). In each of these actions except ... Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills (1957) 353 U.S. 448, 77 S.Ct. 923, ... power to regulate the method of enforcement." (Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co. (1964) 21 A.D.2d ... ...
-
In the Matter of Dandomar Co. Llc v. Town of Pleasant Valley Town Bd.
...Wannalancit Textile Co.-Kute Kiddies Coats ], 21 A.D.2d 762, 763, 250 N.Y.S.2d 493 [86 A.D.3d 89] revd on other grounds, 18 N.Y.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 382, 221 N.E.2d 913). Dandomar maintains that the deference shown by the language in CPLR 201 to different limitations periods prescribed by l......
-
Litton Bionetics, Inc. v. Glen Const. Co., Inc.
...72, 74 (1977). The Court of Appeals of New York rejected this position in In re Chariot Textile Corp. (Wannalancit Textile Co. and Kute Kiddies Coats, Inc.), 18 N.Y.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 382, 221 N.E.2d 913 (1966), by adopting the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. That dissenting......
-
Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.
...Corp. (Bernson Silk Mills, Inc.) 12 N.Y.2d 409, 240 N.Y.S.2d 23, 190 N.E.2d 418 (1963). Matter of Chariot Textiles Corp. (Wannalancit Taxtile Co.) 18 N.Y.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 382, 221 N.E.2d 913 (1966). Matter of Vigo S.S. Corp. (Marship Corp. of Monrovia) 26 N.Y.2d 157, 309 N.Y.S.2d 165, 2......
-
Chapter 3
...535, 312 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 261 N.E.2d 112 (1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 819 (1970); Chariot Textiles Corp. v. Wannalancit Textile Co., 18 N.Y.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 382, 221 N.E.2d 913 (1966).[650] . County of Sullivan v. Nezelek, 42 N.Y.2d 123, 397 N.Y.S.2d 371, 366 N.E.2d 72 (1977).[651] . Id.......