CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Ass'n, Inc.

Decision Date05 February 1988
Citation521 So.2d 939
PartiesCRW, INC., et al. v. TWIN LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. 86-1369.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Billy L. Church of Church, Trussell & Robinson, Pell City, for appellants.

Joseph B. Mays, Jr., of Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Birmingham, for appellees.

JONES, Justice.

CRW, Inc., appeals from a judgment prohibiting it from using roads of the Twin Lakes subdivision in the City of Moody for access to its subdivision development adjacent to Twin Lakes.

The Twin Lakes subdivision was developed in the early 1970's. A lawsuit eventually arose between residents of Twin Lakes and its developer over completion of roads and other common areas of the subdivision. As part of a 1977 consent judgment based upon an agreement between the developer and the residents, the developer transferred the remaining unsold subdivision property to the "Twin Lakes Trust." At the time of the consent judgment, the developer deeded to the trust all of its remaining assets in Twin Lakes. In November 1986, the developer, by way of a quitclaim deed, transferred its interest in the Twin Lakes roads. Testimony indicated that the trust has expended more than $40,000 in paving and finishing roads in the subdivision and that three roads remain incomplete. Although the trust holds more than 26 acres and 15 lots in Twin Lakes, it defers "dedication" of the undeveloped roads to the wishes of the owners association.

Twin Lakes is a confined area, having only one entrance; its roads do not connect with any major thoroughfare other than Alabama Highway 411 and they serve only the 52 homes in the subdivision. A large sign at the entrance reads, "Twin Lakes/Private Property/No Trespassing/Members Only." A smaller sign at the entrance reads, "No Trespassing/Private Property/Members Only."

In 1980, the Twin Lakes Property Owners Association was incorporated, having as its purpose to:

"(a) ... promote pleasure, social recreation and sports activities for its members, their families and guests and to develop and maintain [a] recreationally oriented environment in the Development; (b) ... provide a means whereby those areas within the Development designated as parks, lakes, recreational facilities as may be conveyed to the Association or established by it, may be operated, maintained, repaired or replaced; and (c) ... provide a means for the promulgation and enforcement of all regulations necessary to the governing of the use and enjoyment of such parks, lakes, recreational facilities or other amenities and such other recreational facilities within the Development as may be conveyed to the Association...."

Every person acquiring title to a residential lot in the subdivision is considered a member of the association and is subject to certain requirements and limitations. The association's articles of incorporation provide that it may levy charges and assessments against Twin Lakes property owners to conduct its business and to pay all "licenses, taxes or governmental charges levied upon or imposed against the property of the Association." The articles further allow the association to "own, hold, improve, build upon, operate, maintain and repair real or personal property in connection with the affairs of the Association."

On November 25, 1985, the Moody city council approved a zoning ordinance allowing the Twin Lakes roads to remain private subsequent to annexation and acknowledging the fact that the roads would have to be deeded to the city in order for the city to maintain them. Annexation was approved under these terms on December 9, 1985.

Although plats of the subdivision are recorded in the Probate Court of St. Clair County, the county did not consider the roads in Twin Lakes to be public, and testimony at trial indicated that county maintenance stopped at the entrance. Thus, the Twin Lakes roads are maintained by the association with funds raised through assessments levied upon and paid by association members, notwithstanding the fact that Moody provides police and fire protection to the subdivision.

CRW began the construction of its subdivision in September 1986 by grading and connecting an access road from the CRW subdivision to an interior Twin Lakes road. Heavy machinery and building equipment began to move through Twin Lakes to the CRW access road on a daily basis. CRW told prospective purchasers to enter its subdivision through Twin Lakes and placed an "advertisement" map in the Birmingham News to this effect.

In December 1986, the association and several individual property owners filed a complaint against CRW, its stockholders and its managing officers, seeking a judgment declaring the roads in Twin Lakes to be private; an injunction prohibiting CRW's continued use of the roads; and money damages for trespass and nuisance. The trial court found that the roads were private and enjoined CRW from continuing its use of them, but it denied the association's request for money damages. CRW's motion for a new trial was denied.

The issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in declaring the Twin Lakes roads to be private roads and in enjoining their use by CRW. The trial court, having heard ore tenus testimony, will not have its judgment disturbed on appeal unless it is unsupported by the evidence or is palpably wrong. Mangina v. Bush, 286 Ala. 90, 237 So.2d 479 (1970). This Court, therefore, "will indulge all favorable presumptions to sustain that court's conclusion, and it will be disturbed on appeal only if shown to be plainly erroneous or manifestly unjust." Roberts v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., 410 So.2d 393 (Ala.1982), citing Century Plaza Co. v. Hibbett...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Blair v. Fullmer
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 21 June 1991
    ...with his use of this road. In entering a summary judgment for Fullmer, the trial court relied on CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Association, Inc., 521 So.2d 939 (Ala.1988), and Cottage Hill Land Corp. v. City of Mobile, 443 So.2d 1201 (Ala.1983), held that "[a]cceptance of a proffe......
  • Hereford v. Gingo-Morgan Park
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 2 June 1989
    ...Estates, Inc., 407 So.2d 542 (Ala.1981), and Powell v. Hopkins, 288 Ala. 466, 262 So.2d 289 (1972)." CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Ass'n, Inc., 521 So.2d 939, 941 (Ala.1988). The only argument made by Hereford to support his assertion that Parkview Road is a public road is that th......
  • Meeks v. Hill
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 26 January 1990
    ...the judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. 1 See, e.g., CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners, 521 So.2d 939 (Ala.1988); Templeman v. Resmondo, 507 So.2d 494 (Ala.1987); Cottage Hill Land Corp. v. City of Mobile, 443 So.2d 1201 (Ala.1983......
  • Payne v. Carver
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 13 May 1988
    ...in a non-jury trial unless that judgment is clearly wrong or unjust or is unsupported by the evidence. CRW, Inc. v. Twin Lakes Property Owners Ass'n, Inc., 521 So.2d 939 (Ala.1988). However, "this rule has never precluded this Court from reversing a case where the trial court erroneously ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT