Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc.
| Decision Date | 17 May 1993 |
| Citation | 624 A.2d 1231 |
| Parties | Sharon DANFORTH v. L.L. BEAN, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Henri A. Benoit, II (orally), Bornstein & Hovermale, Portland, for plaintiff.
Michael Richards (orally), Richardson & Troubh, Portland, for defendants.
Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS, RUDMAN and DANA, JJ.
Sharon Danforth appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers' Compensation Commission affirming the Commission's denial of her petition for an award of compensation on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations. She contends that the Commission erred in holding that the 1983 amendment to section 95 of the Workers' Compensation Act, 39 M.R.S.A. § 95 (Supp.1992), did not apply to her claim. We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Appellate Division.
During the summer of 1983 Sharon Danforth, an employee of L.L. Bean, Inc., began experiencing severe pain in her right leg. On September 2, 1983, a doctor, recommended by her supervisor, diagnosed her as suffering from a herniated disc and advised her that her injury was related to her employment. Although she did not return to work for four months, Danforth waited until March 23, 1989, to file a petition for an award of compensation. The Commission denied her petition on the ground that it was barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95 of the Act as it existed on the date of her injury. The Appellate Division affirmed by an evenly divided panel, and we granted Danforth's petition for appellate review.
The 1983 amendment of section 95, which took effect three weeks after Danforth's injury, changed the time from which the two-year statute of limitations begins to run from the date of the employee's injury to the date the employer files a first report pursuant to section 106 of the Act.
Any employee's claim for compensation under the Act shall be barred unless an agreement or a petition as provided in section 94 shall be filed within 2 years after the date of the injury, or, if the employee is paid by the employer or the insurer, without the filing of any petition or agreement, within 2 years of any payment by such employer or insurer for benefits otherwise required by this Act. The 2-year period in which an employee may file his claim does not begin to run until his employer, if he has actual knowledge of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sinclair v. Sinclair
...own struggle with these concepts has not always resulted in clearly defined pathways. See, e.g., Riley, 639 A.2d 626; Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 624 A.2d 1231 (Me.1993); Schlear v. Fiber Materials, Inc., 574 A.2d 876 (Me.1990); Commissioner, Dep't of Human Servs. v. Massey, 537 A.2d 1158 ......
-
Morrissette v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
...in which the statute of limitations has expired. Rutter v. Allstate Auto. Ins., 655 A.2d 1258, 1259 (Me.1995); Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 624 A.2d 1231, 1232 (Me. 1993); Harvie v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 561 A.2d 1023, 1025 (Me.1989); Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc., 415 A.2d 814, 816 ......
-
Murray v. Luzenac Corp., 02-140.
...160 Fla. 879, 37 So.2d 161, 162 (1948)); Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 114 Idaho 284, 756 P.2d 401, 407 (1988); Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 624 A.2d 1231, 1232 (Me.1993); Nichols v. Wilbur, 256 Or. 418, 473 P.2d 1022, 1022-23 (1970); Goff v. Mills, 279 S.C. 382, 308 S.E.2d 778, 780 (19......
-
Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
...our decision in DeMello, 611 A.2d at 986. They misperceive the nature of the change, however, by their contention that Danforth v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 624 A.2d 1231 (Me.1993), is inconsistent with DeMello. We held in DeMello that, contrary to dictum in Schlear v. Fiber Materials, Inc., 574 A.2......