Dixon v. State, S97A0504
| Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
| Citation | 485 S.E.2d 480,268 Ga. 81 |
| Docket Number | No. S97A0504,S97A0504 |
| Parties | , 97 FCDR 1923 DIXON v. The STATE. |
| Decision Date | 02 June 1997 |
Whitman Matthew Dodge, Atlanta, for Dixon.
Gina C. Marshall, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fulton County Dist. Attys. Office, Atlanta, Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Deborah Lynn Gale, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law, Atlanta, for State.
Payton Dixon was found guilty of felony murder, aggravated assault, battery, reckless conduct, and simple assault in connection with the fatal beating of Anthony Westmoreland. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for the felony murder charge. We affirm. 1
The evidence, viewed in favor of the verdict, revealed that on October 2, 1993, Dixon, Michael McKinley, and Ernest Smith were driving Dixon's girlfriend home when they saw Westmoreland walking. Dixon decided to confront Westmoreland regarding an argument they had during a telephone conversation. Dixon and McKinley got out of the car and approached Westmoreland while Smith sat on the car with Dixon's girlfriend. A loud conversation ensued, in which Dixon told Westmoreland that he wanted to fight him "one-on-one" and swung at Westmoreland, missing. Westmoreland backed into a yard and attempted to take off his jacket. At that moment, McKinley attacked Westmoreland from behind striking him in the head and knocking him to the ground. Dixon and McKinley began hitting and kicking Westmoreland in the head, ribs, and back. McKinley dragged Westmoreland into the street where the vicious beating continued until McKinley and Dixon decided to leave. Evidence showed that Westmoreland died from the combined effects of numerous blunt force blows to his head, causing his brain to swell and hemorrhage.
1. Dixon argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of aggravated assault and, therefore, felony murder. The gravamen of Dixon's contention is that because he attacked Westmoreland with his hands and feet, he should have only been tried for battery, OCGA § 16-5-23.1. The court charged the jury on battery, as a lesser included offense of aggravated assault, and the jury found Dixon guilty of aggravated assault. Aggravated assault has two essential elements: (1) that an assault, as defined by OCGA § 16-5-20, was committed on the victim, and (2) that it was aggravated by either (a) an intention to murder, rape, or rob, or (b) the use of a deadly weapon. OCGA § 16-5-21. Although hands and feet are not considered per se deadly weapons within the meaning of OCGA § 16-5-21(a)(2), the jury may find them to be so depending on the circumstances surrounding their use, including the extent of the victim's injuries. Smith v. Hardrick, 266 Ga. 54, 55(2), 464 S.E.2d 198 (1995). Under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the evidence was sufficient to convict Dixon of aggravated assault and felony murder.
2. Dixon contends the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to sever his trial from that of his co-indictee, Michael McKinley. When the death penalty is not sought, the severance of defendants' trials is within the sound discretion of the trial court and its decision will not be disturbed unless there is an...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
York v. State, No. A00A0152-A00A0155
...of the trial court. Its decision will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of that discretion. OCGA § 17-8-4; Dixon v. State, 268 Ga. 81, 83, 485 S.E.2d 480 (1997). A defendant desiring severance has the burden of demonstrating more than the possibility that a separate trial would prov......
-
Miller v. State
...Smith v. Hardrick, 266 Ga. 54, 55, 464 S.E.2d 198 (1995). 7. Smith v. Hardrick, 266 Ga. at 55, 464 S.E.2d 198; Dixon v. State, 268 Ga. 81, 82, 485 S.E.2d 480 (1997); Wheeler v. State, 232 Ga.App. 749, 750, 503 S.E.2d 628 (1998). Contrary to appellant's argument, our decision in Smith v. Har......
-
Taylor v. State, A07A0084.
...the trial court and its decision will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of that discretion. OCGA § 17-8-4." Dixon v. State, 268 Ga. 81, 83, 485 S.E.2d 480 (1997). "[T]he burden is on the defendant requesting the severance to do more than raise the possibility that a separate trial w......
-
Graham v. State, No. A99A0858
...the trial court and its decision will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of that discretion. OCGA § 17-8-4." Dixon v. State, 268 Ga. 81, 83, 485 S.E.2d 480 (1997). A defendant desiring severance has the burden of demonstrating more than the possibility that a separate trial would pro......