Eaton v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Pima Cty.
| Decision Date | 09 May 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,No. 16,A,No. 14217-PR,W,No. 1 and W,16,1 and W,1,14217-PR |
| Citation | 122 Ariz. 377,595 P.2d 169 |
| Parties | Richard Leo EATON, a minor by his parents and next friends, Dale G. Eaton and Janice Eaton, Alicia Sesma, a minor by her parents and next friends, Ray Sesma and Stella Sesma, and the Arizona Association For Retarded Citizens, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees, v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF PIMA COUNTY, Arizona, Mohave Valley Elementary School Districtinslow School Districtinslow High School Districtppellants. |
| Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Appeal (Cause No. C-329028), from Superior Court, Maricopa County; D. L. Greer, Judge.
APPEALS DISMISSED.
Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App.1979) Approved.Venable, Rice, Lee & Capra by Gilbert T. Venable, Phoenix, for appellees.
Jay V. Flake, County Atty., Holbrook by Warner G. Leppin, Deputy County Atty., Winslow, for Winslow School Dist. No. 1 and Winslow High School Dist. No. 1.
The petition for review is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1 of Pima County, Arizona et al., 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App. 1979), is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. We note that Division Two of the Court of Appeals has overruled Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pleasants, 23 Ariz.App. 467, 534 P.2d 275 (1975), the case which was in conflict with Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1, supra, and originally occasioned our granting of the petition for review. See Hanania v. City of Tucson, 123 Ariz. ---, 597 P.2d 190 (App. 1979).
Note : Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in the determination of this matter.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garza v. Swift Transp. Co., Inc.
...Sch. Dist. No. 1, 122 Ariz. 391, 392, 595 P.2d 183, 184 (App. 1979) (citing Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 9), approved and adopted, 122 Ariz. 377, 595 P.2d 169 (1979). In general, "the types of judgments and orders from which appeals may be taken are set forth in A.R.S. § 12-2101." Id. "With certa......
-
Jared P. v. Glade T.
...(citing Eaton v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Pima County, 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App.1979), opinion approved and adopted, 122 Ariz. 377, 595 P.2d 169 (1979)). In an adoption, the entry of a decree of adoption completely severs the rights of "the persons who were the child's parents be......
-
Dayton Women's Health Center v. Enix
...prevents a judgment. See Eaton v. Unified School Dist. No. 1 of Pima Cty. (App.1979), 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183, affirmed (1979), 122 Ariz. 377, 595 P.2d 169. This court in Roemisch v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. (1974), 39 Ohio St.2d 119, 68 O.O.2d 80, 314 N.E.2d 386, held in the syllabus t......
-
Musa v. Adrian
...576 P.2d 517 (App.1978), and Eaton v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1 of Pima Cty., 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App.1979), adopted, 122 Ariz. 377, 595 P.2d 169 (1979). In United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, supra, it was held that an order denying a motion to intervene in an action was app......