Fayette County v. Krause
Decision Date | 10 March 1903 |
Citation | 73 S.W. 51 |
Parties | FAYETTE COUNTY v. KRAUSE et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Fayette County; L. W. Moore, Judge.
Suit by Fayette county against C. D. Krause and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
Robson & Duncan, for appellant. Brown, Lane & Garwood and Walters, Lane & Lenert, for appellees.
In 1886 the county of Fayette constructed a sewer from its courthouse and jail in the city of La Grange along Washington street, in said city, to the Colorado river. Appellees are the owners of business property in La Grange adjacent to Washington street, upon which they have constructed a private system of sewerage, and are claiming the right to connect same with the sewer owned by appellant. This suit was brought by appellant to enjoin the appellees from making such connection, and from injuring or using the sewer of appellant, without its consent. The petition alleges that defendants had wrongfully, and in open disregard of plaintiff's rights, and without its consent, and with intent to appropriate the same to their own use, dug away the earth therefrom, and had broken and injured plaintiff's sewer. The defendants answered by general denial and plea of not guilty, and specially pleaded "that they had the right to connect their private sewer with, and make use of, appellant's sewer, by virtue of an agreement made and entered into at the time of the construction of appellant's sewer by and between the city of La Grange, then an incorporated city under the laws of Texas, and Fayette county [the plaintiff], whereby the city of La Grange, and the citizens of said city, in consideration of the privilege granted appellant to lay its sewer in and through the streets of said city, have the right, whenever they see fit, to connect their sewers with and use appellant's sewer, it having been ascertained that its capacity would be more than sufficient to accommodate the entire population of the city of La Grange, and that the increased use would be of benefit to the same and to all parties concerned, that, upon such understanding and agreement, appellant's sewer was constructed; and that the town of La Grange, by reason thereof, now has the right to connect a system of sewerage of its own with that of appellant, and that each individual citizen in the town of La Grange, if he sees fit to incur the expense necessary to make connection therewith, has such right; that appellees are citizens of the town of La Grange, and owners of property located on block 23 which abuts upon Washington street in said city, the street in which appellant's sewer is laid; that appellees not only have the right to construct, operate, and connect the sewer complained of by appellant by reason of the said agreement, but that they have the special right to do so, accorded them by plaintiff, acting through its commissioners' court, at a session of said court held in the courthouse of La Grange during the month of June, 1900."
The cause was tried by the court below without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, from which judgment the county of Fayette prosecutes this appeal.
The trial court filed the following findings of fact:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hill County v. Colonial Trust Co.
...Gano et al. v. Palo Pinto County, 71 Tex. 99, 8 S. W. 634; Wagner et al. v. Porter (Tex. Civ. App.) 56 S. W. 560; Fayette County v. Krause, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 569, 73 S. W. 51 (writ refused); Douglass et al. v. Myrick et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 422 (writ refused); Mosler Safe Co. v. A......
-
Drake v. Yawn
...district in the manner attempted, their effort could not be given validity by the recognition of any officials. Fayette County v. Krause, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 569, 73 S. W. 51; Davis v. Parks (Tex. Civ. App.) 157 S. W. 449; Tomlinson v. Hunnicutt (Tex. Civ. App.) 147 S. W. Appellees further in......
-
Anderson v. Wood, 7805.
...County, Tex.Civ.App., 184 S.W. 1063; Matthews Lumber Co. v. Van Zandt County, Tex. Civ.App., 77 S.W. 960; Fayette County v. Krause et al., 31 Tex.Civ.App. 569, 73 S. W. 51. Where a right is conferred or obligation imposed on said court, it has implied authority to exercise a broad discretio......
-
Southland Ice Co. v. City of Temple
...Watson v. City of Center, Tex.Civ.App., 286 S.W. 859; Peck v. City of Hempstead, 27 Tex.Civ.App. 80, 65 S.W. 653; Fayette County v. Krause, 31 Tex.Civ.App. 569, 73 S.W. 51. Appellant cites City of Waco v. Prather, 90 Tex. 80, 37 S.W. 312; McNeal v. City of Waco, 89 Tex. 83, 33 S.W. 322; Cit......