Fielden v. Fielden, 21128
| Decision Date | 17 January 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 21128,21128 |
| Citation | 262 S.E.2d 43,274 S.C. 219 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Patricia H. FIELDEN, Respondent, v. Charles L. FIELDEN, Appellant. |
Robert S. Haight, Jr., and Harry Pavilack, Myrtle Beach, for appellant.
D. W. Green, Jr., of Burroughs, Green & Sasser, Conway, for respondent.
This appeal is taken from an Order of the Family Court, issued March 30, 1979, interpreting and enforcing a provision of a Separation Agreement entered into between the parties on November 10, 1977. The record before this Court is void of any indication that this agreement was incorporated or merged into any Family Court order issued prior to the Order now on appeal. 1 The action is then of a contractual nature.
Family Courts have no subject matter jurisdiction over actions in contract. Zwerling v. Zwerling, S.C., 255 S.E.2d 850 (1979); McGrew v. McGrew, S.C., 257 S.E.2d 743 (1979). Lack of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and should be taken notice of by this Court on its own motion. Harden v. S.C.H.D., 266 S.C. 119, 221 S.E.2d 851 (1976); McCullough v. McCullough, 242 S.C. 108, 130 S.E.2d 77 (1963).
Accordingly, the Order of the Family Court is vacated.
1 This Court is aware of the May 16, 1979 Divorce Decree which incorporated the 1977 Separation Agreement. However, that event, which occurred subsequent to entry of the Order on appeal, cannot operate to cure the Family Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction at the time that Order was issued.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Badeaux v. Davis
...and should be taken notice of by this Court. Anderson v. Anderson, 299 S.C. 110, 115, 382 S.E.2d 897, 900 (1989). See Fielden v. Fielden, 274 S.C. 219, 262 S.E.2d 43 (1980); Harden v. South Carolina State Highway Dept., 266 S.C. 119, 221 S.E.2d 851 (1976); State v. Gorie, 256 S.C. 539, 183 ......
-
Peterson v. Peterson
...rights and liabilities thereunder, the family court was without jurisdiction to determine contractual obligations); Fielden v. Fielden, 274 S.C. 219, 262 S.E.2d 43 (1980) (where agreement was not incorporated or merged into any family court order, the action to enforce the agreement was con......
-
Kane v. Kane, 0085
...agreements not incorporated or merged into court orders. Bryant v. Varat, 278 S.C. 77, 292 S.E.2d 298 (1982); Fielden v. Fielden, 274 S.C. 219, 262 S.E.2d 43 (1980); Zwerling v. Zwerling, 273 S.C. 292, 255 S.E.2d 850 (1979). However, where as here, a party asserts an agreement as a bar to t......
-
Austelle v. Austelle, 1032
...to enforce the parties' agreement. Of course, it is axiomatic that subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. Fielden v. Fielden, 274 S.C. 219, 262 S.E.2d 43 (1980). This court, therefore, unfortunately again finds itself bogged in the quagmire of judicial interpretation of marriage diss......