Fitterer v. Crawford
Decision Date | 12 June 1900 |
Parties | FITTERER v. CRAWFORD, Collector, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Grundy Circuit Court. -- Hon. P. C. Stepp, Judge.
Reversed.
John W Schooler, S. S. Kelso and S. C. Price for appellant.
(1) The Constitution and statute exempting property from taxation are to be strictly construed against the claim of exemption. Washington University v. Rouse, 42 Mo. 323; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 532; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 42; State ex rel. v Arnold, 136 Mo. 450; Scotland County v Railroad, 65 Mo. 134; State ex rel. v. Lange, 16 Mo.App. 468; Wyman v. St. Louis, 17 Mo. 337; Railroad v. Cass Co., 53 Mo. 17; Cincinnati College v. The State, 19 Ohio 110; Redemptorist Fathers v. Boston, 129 Mass. 180; Portland Hibernian Society v. Kelly, 28 Ore. 173; Railroad v. Guffey, 120 U.S. 569; Bangor v. Masonic Lodge, 73 Me. 428; Co. Commissioners v. Sisters of Charity, 48 Md. 34; Theological Seminary v. The People ex rel., 101 Ill. 578; Mayor of Baltimore v. Grand Lodge, 60 Md. 280; 25 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 157, and authorities cited in n. 3, p. 157, note 1, p. 158. (2) The plaintiff lodge should not be considered a charitable institution within the meaning of our Constitution and statute, exempting certain property from taxation "when used for purposes purely charitable." (3) The first story of the building involved in this case is a store room for rent; the second story is divided into offices which are rented to tenants, and the third floor is used by the plaintiff lodge, for lodge room and ante-rooms in connection therewith, which lodge and ante-rooms are used as a meeting place for the lodge. It is too plain to admit of any sort of contention that the first and second stories are not used for charitable purposes. They are used as any other business building is used in the city of Trenton. In such cases the building is not exempt. St. Marys School v. Crowl, 10 Kan. 333; Vail v. Beach, 10 Kan. 166; Washburn College v. Commissioners, 8 Kan. 344; Commissioners v. Sisters of Charity, 48 Md. 34; Appeal Tax Court v. Baltimore Academy, 50 Md. 437; People v. Graceland Cemetery, 86 Ill. 336; Seminary v. The People ex rel., 101 Ill. 578; Des Moines Lodge v. County of Polk, 56 Ia. 34; Wayland v. St. Louis, 17 Mo. 335. (4) The application of the proceeds of property to a purpose purely charitable within the meaning of our statute, would not meet the requirement that the property itself shall be used exclusively for purposes purely charitable as a condition of its exemption from taxation. Literary Ass'n v. Pelton, 36 Oh. St. 253; Portland Hibernian Society v. Kelly, 28 Or. 173; Cincinnati College v. State, 19 Oh. 110; Trustees v. Boston, 120 Mass. 212.
Hall & Hall for respondents.
(1) The respondent lodge is a charitable institution. State ex rel. v. Powers, 10 Mo.App. 263; Bishop Residence Co. v. Hudson, 91 Mo. 671; Missouri Historical Society v. Academy of Science, Lucas et al., 94 Mo. 459; Ould v. Washington Hospital, 95 U.S. 303; Duke v. Fuller, 9 N.H. 536; Philadelphia v. Masonic Home, 160 Pa. St. 372; Fire Insurance Patrol v. Bogel, 120 Pa. St. 504. (2) It is a charitable institution within the meaning of the law exempting property of charitable institutions from taxation, though it limits its benefits to its own members and their families. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. Kelly, 28 Or. 173; Burd Orphan Asylum v. School Dist., 90 Pa. St. 21; Savannah v. Solomon Lodge, 53 Ga. 93; Indianapolis v. Grand Master, 25 Ind. 518; State v. Board of Assessors, 34 La. 574; State v. Addison, 2 S.C. 499; Petersburg v. Petersburg Ben. Ass'n, 78 Va. 431. (3) Its building and ground are exempt from taxation under the Constitution and statutes of the State of Missouri. Constitution, art. X, sec. 6; R. S. 1889, sec. 7504. (4) The fact that respondent lodge rents a part of its building and uses the rents for the purposes of the lodge does not render its property subject to taxation. State ex rel. v. Powers, 10 Mo.App. 263; s. c., 74 Mo. 476; Gymnastic Society v. Hudson, 12 Mo.App. 342; s. c., 85 Mo. 32; Cooper Hospital v. Burdsall (N. J.), 42 A. 853; The City of Henderson v. Strangers Rest Lodge, 17 S.W. 213; County of Henepin v. Brotherhood of Gethsemane, 27 Minn. 460; Book Agents v. Hinton County Trustee, 21 S.W. 321; Boys' School v. Gill, 145 Mass. 139.
This is an injunction proceeding by which the plaintiffs, John Fitterer, William P. Lafferty and Chas. H. Cook, trustees of Trenton Lodge No. 111 of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons, seek to enjoin and restrain the collection of $ 55.50 taxes levied by the county court of Grundy county, in 1897, for state, county, township, school and other taxes, against the property of said lodge, including its lodge building, which property is alleged to be used for purposes purely charitable.
A preliminary injunction was granted, which upon final hearing was made perpetual. Defendant appeals.
The case was tried upon the following agreed state of facts:
To continue reading
Request your trial