Foley v. Hialeah Race Course

Decision Date03 August 1951
Citation53 So.2d 771
PartiesFOLEY et ux. v. HIALEAH RACE COURSE, Inc.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Brown & Dean, Miami, for appellants.

George J. Baya, Miami, for appellee.

ADAMS, Justice.

We review a judgment holding plaintiff's complaint was insufficient to state a cause of action.

The complaint alleged that defendant maintained a park where horse racing was conducted; that auxiliary thereto defendant maintained a parking lot as a convenience to its patrons; that defendant 'carelessly and negligently supervised, maintained and controlled the said race park and parking area, in that there were an insufficient number of traffic attendants; that the said attendants were improperly stationed; that the said attendants were not performing their duties; and that there were insufficient traffic warning devices and controls.'

Plaintiff asserts that by reason of defendant's neglect, while driving his own automobile, he collided with an automobile being driven by a third party, who was departing from the parking lot, and was damaged.

The judgment is correct. There is nothing inherently dangerous about a parking lot. No factual allegation is made to indicate a breach of duty which proximately contributed to plaintiff's injury. The allegations are too vague and general to state a cause of action. The proximate cause of plaintiff's injury was by no act of defendant. See Rosen v. City of Miami, 141 Fla. 664, 193 So. 749; Williams v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 56 Fla. 735, 48 So. 209, 24 L.R.A.,N.S., 134.

The judgment is affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and CHAPMAN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Pierson v. Sewell
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 8 Agosto 1975
    ...& Co., 169 Okl. 170, 36 P.2d 504 (1934). Cf. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co. v. Dailey, 60 Wash. 566, 111 P. 869 (1910); Foley v. Hialeah Race Course, 53 So.2d 771 (Fla.1951); Giammarino v. J. W. Caldewey Const. Co., 72 S.W.2d 159 (Mo.App.1934).12 Valley Lumber Etc. Co. v. Nickerson, 13 Idaho 6......
  • Steigman v. Danese
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Enero 1987
    ...and Proc. s. 6-5 (1985). Each element essential to recovery for the particular cause of action must be alleged. Foley v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc., 53 So.2d 771 (Fla.1951). And while it is not sufficient to allege conclusions alone, "conclusions are not objectionable if they are supported b......
  • Goldman v. Hollywood Beach Hotel Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 9 Mayo 1957
    ...hotel was similar to a parking lot, and it has been held that there is nothing inherently dangerous about a parking lot. Foley v. Hialeah Race Course, Fla., 53 So.2d 771; Jackson v. Pike, Fla., 87 So.2d 410. If it be assumed that the evidence of the appellant has established, prima facie, t......
  • Walker v. Feltman, 58-633
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 21 Abril 1959
    ...889; Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 2d 746. The defendants have urged the application of the rule in Foley v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc., Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 771, and Heps v. Burdine's, Inc., Fla.1954, 69 So.2d 340. The Foley case involved an automobile collision in a parking lo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT