Fulton County v. State
| Decision Date | 29 October 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. S07A1149.,S07A1149. |
| Citation | 651 S.E.2d 679,282 Ga. 570 |
| Parties | FULTON COUNTY v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Willie Jake Lovett, Jr., Overtis Hicks Brantley, Marina Katharine Duncan, Coy Jerrome Johnson, Jr., Atlanta, for Appellant.
Gary Parker, Public Defender Standards Council, Robert B. Remar, Rogers & Hardin LLP, Atlanta, Robert L. McGlasson, McGlasson & Associates, PC, Decatur, Henderson Hill, Jacob H. Sussman, Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresham & Sumter, Charlotte, NC, Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Christopher Michael Quinn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomas Joseph Mew, IV, Rogers & Hardin, Atlanta, for Appellee.
James F. Grubiak, Kemuel Allan Kimbrough, Atlanta, Jeff S. Akins, Bullock County Board of Commissioners, Statesboro, Amicus Appellant.
The State is seeking the death penalty against Brian Nichols in this murder case. He was declared indigent and counsel was appointed to represent him. Due to budgetary constraints of the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, the trial court held a hearing to determine who would pay the escalating costs of Brian Nichols' defense. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court entered an order requiring Fulton County to pay a portion of Nichols' expenses. More particularly, the trial court ordered the county to cover the costs of transcribing telephone conversations made by or to Nichols at the jail and of presenting demonstrative evidence in the courtroom in a digital format.1 The county filed this direct appeal, asserting the trial court erred in ordering it to pay costs associated with Nichols' defense.
1. Trammel v. Clayton County Board of El-10 Commissioners, 250 Ga.App. 310, 311, 551 S.E.2d 412 (2001).
The order in question is not a final judgment inasmuch as it stems from a case which remains pending below. OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(1); Crane v. State, 281 Ga. 635, 636, 641 S.E.2d 795 (2007). It follows that the order is interlocutory and that it is not appealable directly unless it falls within the collateral order exception to the finality rule. See Thomas v. State, 276 Ga. 853, 583 S.E.2d 848 (2003); Scroggins v. Edmondson, 250 Ga. 430, 431, 432, 297 S.E.2d 469 (1982).
The collateral order exception is to be applied if the order (1) resolves an issue that is "substantially separate" from the basic issues to be decided at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying action can affect it. In re Paul, 270 Ga. 680, 682, 683, 513 S.E.2d 219 (1999); Scroggins, supra. The order in this case meets this test. It concerns a matter — the payment of expenses — wholly unrelated to the basic issues to be decided in this criminal case. The matter of payment would be unresolved and the trial of this case put on hold, or perhaps upended, if review had to await final judgment. Finally, the order resolves the matter completely and nothing remains in the underlying case to affect it. Therefore, we hold that a county may file a direct appeal from an order requiring it to pay a defendant's expenses in a murder case under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule.
2. It is argued that the costs in question are contingent expenses incurred in the course of a trial and that, therefore, they are to be paid by the county under OCGA § 15-6-24.2 We disagree.
"`Before an officer can be required to pay out public money, or be justified in doing so, those who demand its payment should be able to show a clear provision of the law which entitles them to receive it.'" Freeney v. Geoghegan, 177 Ga. 142, 145, 169 S.E. 882 (1933). OCGA § 15-6-24 calls for a county to pay itemized expenses that are incurred ordinarily in a courtroom proceeding, as well as for the payment of "similar items." But "similar items" cannot be deemed to include unusual expenses, i.e., expenses which are not typically incurred at trial.
In Maxwell v. Cumming, 58 Ga. 384 1877, this court strongly expressed its views as to the strictness with which the contingent expenses of the superior courts should be...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Duke v. State, S19M0969
...the conditions under which the judgment of the trial court may be considered appealable." (Citation omitted.) Fulton County v. State , 282 Ga. 570, 570 (1), 651 S.E.2d 679 (2007). OCGA § 5-6-34 governs what trial court orders may be reviewed immediately by an appellate court. Specifically, ......
- Rivera v. Washington
-
First Christ v. Owens Temple
... ... This appeal involves a dispute over the ownership of church property in Chatham County. Plaintiffs filed suit in their own names and in the name of First Christ Holiness Church, Inc ... representative capacity, to bring or defend an action shall be determined by the law of this state."12 The purpose of this section is to protect parties against subsequent actions by the individuals ... 2. Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, ___, 651 S.E.2d 679 (2007); Crane v. State, 281 Ga. 635, 635, 641 ... ...
-
Britt v. State
... ... As this Court recently reiterated in Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 651 S.E.2d 679 (2007), the collateral order exception is to be applied if the order being appealed "(1) resolves an ... ...
-
Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...Id. at 93-94, 658 S.E.2d at 843 (citing O.C.G.A. Sec. 35-8-7.1(a)(6) (2006 & Supp. 2008) (defining unprofessional conduct)). 173. 282 Ga. 570, 651 S.E.2d 679 (2007). 174. Id. at 570, 651 S.E.2d at 680. 175. Id. at 571, 651 S.E.2d at 681 (quoting Freeney v. Geoghegan, 177 Ga. 142, 145, 169 S......
-
Death Penalty Law - Therese M. Day
...Vergara, 283 Ga. at 185, 657 S.E.2d at 871. 133. Due to space restrictions, the following cases have been omitted: Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 651 S.E.2d 679 (2007); Britt v. State, 282 Ga. 746, 653 S.E.2d 713 (2007) (involving the state funding scheme for capital cases in Georgia)......