Gill v. Ryals, 381
| Decision Date | 17 October 1966 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 381,381 |
| Citation | 17 L.Ed.2d 17,385 U.S. 19,87 S.Ct. 212 |
| Parties | Lillian S. McGILL et al. v. C. F. RYALS et al. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Vernon Z. Crawford, Marton Stavis, William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy and Benjamin E. Smith, for appellants.
Truman Hobbs, for appellees.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the case was not appropriate for a three-judge court.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that a three-judge court was properly convened and would affirm the judgment of the lower court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
36 cases
- Craycroft v. Ferrall
- Stanisic v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV.
- Betonie v. Sizemore
-
Rimarcik v. Johansen
...385 U.S. 851, 87 S.Ct. 76, 17 L.Ed.2d 79 (1966). But see, McGill v. Ryals, 253 F.Supp. 374 (D. Ala.), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 19, 87 S.Ct. 212, 17 L.Ed.2d 17 (1966); Smith v. Paris, 257 F.Supp. 901 (D.Ala.1966), aff'd, 386 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1967). 17 For a similar case declaring part of......
Request a trial to view additional results