Glo-Ann Plastic Industries, Inc. v. Peak Textiles, Inc.

• Decision Date: 30 May 1975
• Docket Number: No. 50525,No. 2,GLO-ANN,50525,2
• Citation: 216 S.E.2d 715,134 Ga.App. 924
• Parties: PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PEAK TEXTILES, INC
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 715

216 S.E.2d 715

134 Ga.App. 924

GLO-ANN PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PEAK TEXTILES, INC.

No. 50525.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 2.

May 30, 1975.

Smith & Jones, William E. Smith, Americus, for appellant.

Myers & Parks, J. Frank Meyers, Michael A. Fennessy, Americus, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

CLARK, Judge.

In this appeal by a defendant corporation from an adverse verdict and judgment, there are sixteen enumerations of error. Thirteen of these assert that certain evidence and exhibits were erroneously admitted into evidence. The remaining three enumerations contend the trial court erred in denying defendant's motions for directed verdict. The evidentiary enumerations can be divided into four groups which deal respectively with questions of relevancy, the Dead Man's Statute, lack of foundation, and admissibility for the limited purpose of impeachment. We will deal with each group separately.

1. Relevancy: 'No precise and universal test of the relevancy of testimony is furnished by the law, but each must be determined in accordance with the facts of that particular case.' Garner v. State, 83 Ga.App. 178, 184, 63 S.E.2d 225, 230. 'Any evidence is relevant which logically tends to prove or to disprove a material fact which is at issue in the case, and every act or circumstance serving to elucidate or to throw light upon a material issue or issues is relevant.' McLabb v. State, 70 Ga.App. 798, 799, 29 S.E.2d 643, 644.

Justice Thomas S. Candler, ¹ in Frady v. State, 212 Ga. 84, 86, 90 S.E.2d 664, 666, wrote: 'To discover the truth is the object and purpose of all legal investigations, and this result can be attained by a jury only after hearing all relevant and material evidence respecting the controversy under investigation. No party to litigation is ever unfarly treated by a full disclosure of all relevant facts concerning the issue and the rules of evidence have been framed to the prominent end that justice shall always prevail among litigants.'

In reviewing the trial transcript we have in each instance tested the reason stated by the trial judge as to relevancy in overruling the defendant's objections. On each of the eight occasions referred to in enumerations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9, we have determined the trial judge was correct.

2. Dead Man's Act: Whenever trial lawyers are faced with the introduction of evidence in which a deceased person is involved they must conform with the necessity of satisfying the requirements of Code Ann. § 38-1603. The existence of problems in this area of the 'Dead Man's Act' is shown by the fact that the annotations in our Annotated Code under this section cover 48 pages. These difficulties are not limited to plaintiffs. Thus, we note that no evidence was introduced in behalf of the defendant corporation, which probably stemmed from the fact of the death of its president.

( a) Enumeration number 7 attacks the ruling below which admitted sixteen invoices in which plaintiff had billed defendant corporation monthly for warehouse management fees and rentals. Each of these stated dates and amount. Each contained this language: 'per agreement between J. David Peek and Phil Stillpass.' The objection was based upon the subsequent death of Stillpass so that such documents would be inadmissible under the 'Dead Man's Act.' Appellant argues that in allowing these invoices into evidence, the trial judge enabled plaintiff 'to do by indirection what could not be done by direction.' This argument fails since 'indirection' has been approved in cases involving the 'Dead Man's Act.' Thus, original books of account have been held admissible even though the other party is dead (Strickland v. Wynn, 51 Ga. 600) and evidence presented under the Georgia Business Records Act is admissible against a deceased debtor (F. & W. Farm Service v. C. & S. Nat. Bank, 116 Ga.App. 757, 758(1), 159 S.E.2d 190). Further in Prothro v. Walker, 202 Ga. 71, 72(2), 42 S.E.2d 114, 116, it was pointed out that Code Ann. § 38-1603 'deals with the competency of a witness to testify against a deceased, and not with the question as to whether or not such evidence was admissible as declarations or entries of a deceased person.' The trial court did not err.

( b) Enumeration 10 involved plaintiff's exhibits numbered 34 and 36. These were two letters written by plaintiff to defendant's corporate secretary stating plaintiff's contentions. In admitting these letters over defendant's objections, the trial judge stated he was doing so for the limited purpose of showing that the letters had been written and then expressly instructed the jury that they were not to consider anything therein relating to any agreement with the deceased or any conversations or any transactions with the named decedent. Counsel recognizes that under such circumstances the applicable procedure is for the court to afford counsel an opportunity to point out and conceal or paste over any objectionable part. Appellant interprets Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Williams, 62 Ga.App....