Hafer v. Lowry
| Decision Date | 01 March 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. A12A2549.,A12A2549. |
| Citation | 320 Ga.App. 76,739 S.E.2d 84 |
| Parties | HAFER v. LOWRY. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Tisinger Vance, Kenneth Brown Crawford, Carrollton, for Appellant.
Diane Marilyn Sternlieb, for Appellee.
The father of a minor child appeals from a trial court order terminating his parental rights and granting a petition for stepparent adoption of the child. Because the trial court violated the father's right to be heard and show cause why his parental rights should not be terminated, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.
Appellant Michael Hafer and Tara Hafer Lowry were formerly married. During the marriage, in November 2007, Tara gave birth to the couple's child, M.Q.H. The couple divorced in September 2008, and the divorce decree awarded sole custody of the child to Tara. In August 2011, Tara married Terry Lowry, Jr. A month later, in September 2011, Terry Lowry filed a petition for stepparent adoption pursuant to OCGA § 19–8–10(b), claiming, among other things, that Hafer's parental rights should be terminated because for more than a year he had failed to communicate with the child or provide for the child's care and support as required by the divorce decree. Hafer filed an objection to the petition.
On March 22, 2012, the trial court held a hearing on the petition. Lowry's attorney called Hafer as the first witness for purposes of cross-examination. Hafer was questioned by opposing counsel and his own attorney. Then, while he was on re-cross-examination, the trial judge intervened, stopped all presentation of the evidence, and announced his ruling. As Hafer's counsel was in the midst of an evidentiary stipulation, the trial judge interrupted him and declared, “At any rate, though, regardless of all that, I think I've heard enough of this case and I'm ready to make a ruling in the case.” The judge then ruled that Hafer had lost his parental rights and granted the stepparent adoption. Counsel for Hafer immediately objected, stating, The trial judge disregarded the objection, moved on to other matters and subsequently entered its final order granting the stepparent adoption.
Generally, a stepparent may adopt his or her spouse's child only if the biological parent whose rights will end with the adoption voluntarily and in writing surrenders all of his or her rights to the child to the stepparent for the purpose of enabling the stepparent to adopt the child. If the biological parent refuses to surrender his or her parental rights, OCGA § 19–8–10(b) provides that the court may still grant the stepparent's petition to adopt the child if it finds, inter alia, that there is clear and convincing evidence that the parent, for a period of one year or longer immediately prior to the filing of the petition for adoption, without justifiable cause, has significantly failed: (1) To communicate or to make a bona fide attempt to communicate with that child in a meaningful, supportive, parental manner; or (2) To provide for the care and support of that child as required by law or judicial decree.
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Weber v. Livingston, 309 Ga.App. 665, 666, 710 S.E.2d 864 (2011).
In such a case, it is the stepparent petitioner's burden to prove that termination of the biological parent's parental rights is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. Hauck
...that adoption laws must be strictly construed in favor of natural parents." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hafer v. Lowry , 320 Ga. App. 76, 78, 739 S.E.2d 84 (2013) ; see V. L. v. E. L. , –––U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 1017 (II), 194 L.Ed.2d 92 (2016). Because the petition lacked the statuto......
-
Skipper v. Paul
...(1994).7 (Punctuation omitted.) In re Stroh , 240 Ga. App. 835, 840 (1) (b) (i), 523 S.E.2d 887 (1999). See also Hafer v. Lowry , 320 Ga. App. 76, 78, 739 S.E.2d 84 (2013) ("It is well settled that adoption laws must be strictly construed in favor of natural parents.") (punctuation omitted)......
-
CML-Ga Smyrna, LLC v. Atlanta Real Estate Invs., LLC, S13A1475.
...from presenting witnesses or other evidence, or curtail the full presentation of Premier's arguments at the hearing. See Hafer v. Lowry, 320 Ga.App. 76, 78, 739 S.E.2d 84 (2013); CRS Sirrine, Inc. v. Dravo Corp., 213 Ga.App. 710, 714(1), 445 S.E.2d 782 (1994). Premier also argues that it wa......
-
First Merit Credit Servs. v. Fairway Aviation, LLC
...additional question and given the appellant an opportunity to be heard before reaching its final determination); Hafer v. Lowry , 320 Ga. App. 76, 78, 739 S.E.2d 84 (2013) (vacating and remanding where "the trial court deprived [the appellant] of a meaningful opportunity to be heard").Judgm......