Hahne v. State of New York
| Decision Date | 24 January 2002 |
| Citation | 736 N.Y.S.2d 761,290 A.D.2d 858 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | JACQUELINE HAHNE et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No. 96283.) |
Crew III, J.
Claimant Jacqueline Hahne was employed as a data entry clerk for the Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC) at its headquarters in Ray Brook, Essex County. Jose Ortiz was an inmate confined at Camp Gabriels, a minimum security prison, also located in Essex County. On August 23, 1995 Ortiz, as part of a work release program, was performing janitorial services at DEC headquarters and, while emptying a wastepaper basket at Hahne's desk, put his right hand on the side of her face and attempted to kiss her.
Hahne and her husband, derivatively, filed a notice of claim alleging that the State was vicariously liable for Ortiz's assault. Following a bifurcated trial, the Court of Claims granted the State's motion to dismiss the claim on the ground that Hahne's exclusive remedy is workers' compensation. This appeal by claimants ensued.
It is axiomatic that an employee injured during his or her employment is limited in his or her remedy to workers' compensation unless the injury was due "`to an intentional tort perpetrated by the employer or at the employer's direction'" (Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 189 AD2d 497, 500, lv dismissed 82 NY2d 748, quoting Finch v Swingly, 42 AD2d 1035). Here, there is absolutely no evidence in the record that Ortiz perpetrated the alleged assault at the direction of the State or any of its employees. Claimants nevertheless contend that the State is liable for Ortiz's conduct on the theory of respondeat superior. We disagree. To be sure, inasmuch as the State undertook to perform janitorial services at DEC headquarters through the use of its inmates, it would be liable for their tortious acts committed in the performance of such duties (see, Washington v State of New York, 277 App Div 1079, lv denied 302 NY 952). However, where, as here, a tort is committed solely for the personal motives of the employee and is unrelated to the furtherance of the employer's business, no liability will attach (see, e.g., Fainberg v Dalton Kent Sec. Group, 268 AD2d 247, 248; Joshua S. v Casey, 206 AD2d 839).
To the extent that claimants' brief can be read to claim that the State is liable for the negligent supervision of Ortiz, there is utterly no record evidence of his propensity to engage in the type of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Knicrumah v. Albany City School Dist.
...omitted); Oliva v. City of New York, 297 A.D.2d 789, 748 N.Y.S.2d 164, 166 (2d Dept.2002) (negligent hiring); Hahne v. State, 290 A.D.2d 858, 736 N.Y.S.2d 761, 763 (3d Dept.2002) (negligent supervision); see also Daniels v. Loizzo, 174 F.R.D. 295, 299 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (negligent retention and......
-
Kinge v. State
...omitted]; see Travis v. United Health Servs. Hosps., Inc., 23 A.D.3d 884, 884-885, 804 N.Y.S.2d 840 [2005]; Hahne v. State of New York, 290 A.D.2d 858, 859, 736 N.Y.S.2d 761 [2002] ). Here, following recovery of the gas can from the living room of the victims' home, it was immediately subje......
-
Level 3 Commc'ns, LLC v. Essex Cnty.
...869 N.Y.S.2d 661 [2008], affd. 13 N.Y.3d 475, 893 N.Y.S.2d 453, 921 N.E.2d 145 [2009] ; compare Bias Limud Torah v. County of Sullivan, 290 A.D.2d at 858, 736 N.Y.S.2d 523 ). Indeed, petitioner did nothing to indicate that its payments were involuntary until nearly 18 months after the final......
-
Stamile v. Cnty. of Nassau
...constitute notice to defendants that there was a danger of [abuser] sexually assaulting plaintiffs"); see also Hahne v. State of N.Y., 290 A.D.2d 858, 859, 736 N.Y.S.2d 761 (2002) (holding that "there is utterly no record evidence of [defendant's] propensity to engage in the type of conduct......