Hall v. State
Decision Date | 29 October 1992 |
Docket Number | No. S92A0548,S92A0548 |
Parties | HALL v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Jonathan J. Wade, Zion, Tarleton & Siskin, Decatur, for Hall.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Carl Greenberg, Charles W. Smegal, Joseph F. Burford, Asst. Dist. Attys., Atlanta, for State.
Hall was convicted of possession with intent to distribute 2.2 grams of cocaine and sentenced to life imprisonment under the mandatory sentencing provision of OCGA § 16-13-30(d), as this was a second conviction. 1 On appeal, Hall challenges the constitutionality of OCGA § 16-13-30(b) and (d).
1. Hall challenges the constitutionality of provisions (b) and (d) of OCGA § 16-13-30, on their face, and as applied.
(a) We have upheld the constitutionality of the statute against various challenges. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 261 Ga. 739, 410 S.E.2d 422 (1991) ( ); Isom v. State, 261 Ga. 596, 408 S.E.2d 701 (1991) ( ); Stephens v. State, 261 Ga. 467, 468, 405 S.E.2d 483 (1991) ( ); Tillman v. State, 260 Ga. 801, 400 S.E.2d 632 (1991) ( ); Grant v. State, 258 Ga. 299, 368 S.E.2d 737 (1988) ( ).
(b) The evidence of selective enforcement against young and impoverished blacks fails to meet the standard of intentional discrimination announced in State v. Causey, 246 Ga. 735(2), 273 S.E.2d 6 (1980); State v. Agan, 259 Ga. 541, 546-9(6), 384 S.E.2d 863 (1989); and State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 885(Minn. 1991). In State v. Agan we said "... proof of selective prosecution requires evidence that prosecution represents intentional or purposeful discrimination deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard or arbitrary classification."
2. The trial court's determination that Hall did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel was not error under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
3. We have reviewed Hall's remaining claims of error. We hold that the evidence is sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); and there was no error in the trial of the case that warrants a new trial, or other substantial relief.
Judgment affirmed.
I concur separately to point out that while there is some evidence to support appellant's allegation of selective prosecution, that evidence is insufficient under both the intentional discrimination standard adopted by this court in State v. Causey, 246 Ga. 735(2), 273 S.E.2d 6 (1980), and the disparate treatment standard utilized in State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 886 (Minn.1991). Accordingly, I join the majority in affirming the trial court's judgment.
1 The crime was committed on November 20, 1990, and Hall was indicted on December 28, 1990. He was convicted and sentenced on May 10, 1991. His motion for new trial was filed on June 6, 1991, amended on October 23, 1991, and denied on December 2, 1991. The notice of appeal was filed on January 2, 1992, and docketed in this court on February 6, 1992. The appeal was argued on April 13, 1992.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stephens v. State
...insufficient evidence of selective enforcement against blacks to meet the standard of intentional discrimination. See Hall v. State, 262 Ga. 596, 597, 422 S.E.2d 533 (1992) (relying on standard announced in Causey), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1055, 113 S.Ct. 1956, 123 L.Ed.2d 660 (1993); Hailey......
-
H&r Block Eastern Enter.S Inc v. Morris
... ... ” as “(i) every person or entity with whom Associate had contact because Associate prepared or electronically transmitted their federal or state tax return during the term of this Agreement, and (ii) every person or entity with whom Associate had contact because Associate provided or offered ... ...
-
Hancock v. State
...statutes, a "sentence for second offense of possession of cocaine is greater than that for trafficking in cocaine." Hall v. State, 262 Ga. 596, 597(1a), 422 S.E.2d 533. Nevertheless, neither OCGA § 16-1-6 nor OCGA § 16-1-7 purport to make any offense a greater offense, either as a matter of......
-
Hailey v. State, S93A0186
...contends that § 16-13-30(d) is being discriminatorily enforced against African-Americans. However, as we did in Hall v. State, 262 Ga. 596, 597(1)(b), 422 S.E.2d 533 (1992), we find that Hailey's evidence "fails to meet the standard of intentional discrimination." Id. 2. Hailey also contend......
-
Restrictions on Post-employment Competition by an Executive Under Georgia Law - Steven E. Harbour
...422 S.E.2d at 531. 135. Id. at 467-68, 422 S.E.2d at 532-33. 136. Id. at 466, 422 S.E.2d at 532 (citations omitted). 137. Id. at 467, 422 S.E.2d at 533. 138. See Woollcott, supra note 15. 139. 262 Ga. at 464-65, 422 S.E.2d at 531. 140. Id. at 465 n.1, 422 S.E.2d at 531 n.1. 141. Id. at 464,......
-
Criminal Law and Procedure: a Two-year Survey - James P. Fleissner
...U.S. 279 (1987). 59. Stephens, 265 Ga. at 357, 456 S.E.2d at 561. See Cain v. State, 262 Ga. 598, 422 S.E.2d 535 (1992); Hall v. State, 262 Ga. 596, 422 S.E.2d 533 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1055 (1993); Hailey v. State, 263 Ga. 210, 429 S.E.2d 917 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1048 (1......
-
Labor and Employment Law - W. Melvin Haas, Iii, William M. Clifton, Iii, and W. Jonathan Martin, Ii
...(quoting W.R. Grace, 262 Ga. at 466, 422 S.E.2d at 532). 176. Id. at 482, 629 S.E.2d at 803 (quoting W.R. Grace, 262 Ga. at 467-68, 422 S.E.2d at 533). 177. Id. (citation omitted). 178. See Howard Schultz, 239 Ga. at 183, 236 S.E.2d at 267. 179. 278 Ga. App. 395, 629 S.E.2d 95 (2006). 180. ......