Harrison v. Alabama Forever Wild Land Trust
Decision Date | 22 August 2008 |
Docket Number | 1070768. |
Citation | 4 So.3d 1114 |
Parties | Joe HARRISON, as executor of the estate of Wyatt Harrison, deceased v. THE ALABAMA FOREVER WILD LAND TRUST. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Mitchell D. Hays, Tuscumbia, for appellant.
James A. Bradford and David Burkholder of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Birmingham; and Braxton W. Ashe of Ashe & Wright, P.C., Tuscumbia, for appellee.
Joe Harrison, as executor of the estate of Wyatt Harrison, deceased, sued the Alabama Forever Wild Land Trust ("the Trust Fund") and others1 pursuant to § 6-6-540, Ala.Code 1975, seeking to quiet title to an uninhabited 160-acre parcel of land in Colbert County ("the property") claimed by both the Harrison family and the Trust Fund.2 The trial court entered a summary judgment quieting title to the property in favor of the Trust Fund, and Harrison now appeals. We affirm.
The property was originally granted to Greenberry Williams, Sr., by the United States government in 1848. At that time, the property was located in Franklin County; however, the property was located in that part of Franklin County that became Colbert County when the legislature created Colbert County in 1870.
In 1856, Greenberry Williams, Sr., conveyed the property to his son, Ausker Williams, by deed. Thereafter, there is a break in the chain of title because the Franklin County courthouse was destroyed by fire in 1890.3 The next instrument involving the property was not recorded until 1907, when a deed was recorded in Colbert County by which Greenberry Williams, Jr.—son of Greenberry Williams, Sr., and brother to Ausker Williams—purported to convey the property to J.T. Crotts and P.B. Worley. The property thereafter was owned by various individuals and timber companies, with each conveyance recorded in Colbert County, before the land was ultimately purchased by the Trust Fund in 2002. Since that time the property has been managed by the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
Joe Harrison lays claim to the property via the chain of title involving Ausker Williams. Harrison, a descendant of Greenberry Williams, Jr., disputes the validity of the 1907 deed purportedly executed by his great-great-grandfather and argues that the property was instead passed down through the Ausker Williams family pursuant to the 1856 deed by which Greenberry Williams, Sr., conveyed the property to Ausker Williams. In 1953, that 1856 deed was refiled in Colbert County by Mary Waddell Harrison—the granddaughter of Greenberry Williams, Jr., and the grandmother of Joe Harrison. Subsequently, between 1985 and 1987, the living descendants of Ausker Williams, all of whom appear to have left Alabama, executed quitclaim deeds conveying their respective interests in the property to Mary Waddell Harrison. Mary Waddell Harrison then devised the property to her son Wyatt Harrison—the deceased father of Joe Harrison—when she died in 1990.
On December 23, 2005, Harrison filed a complaint in the Colbert Circuit Court seeking to quiet title to the property. The Trust Fund answered the complaint, and both Harrison and the Trust Fund thereafter filed summary-judgment motions asking the trial court to quiet title to the property in their favor. The trial court initially denied both motions; however, after conducting additional discovery, the parties filed renewed motions for summary judgment and, on January 14, 2008, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the Trust Fund without specifying the grounds for its ruling. On February 22, 2008, Harrison filed his notice of appeal to this Court.
Section 6-6-540, Ala.Code 1975, provides:
"When any person is in peaceable possession of lands, whether actual or constructive, claiming to own the same, in his own right or as personal representative or guardian, and his title thereto, or any part thereof, is denied or disputed or any other person claims or is reputed to own the same, any part thereof, or any interest therein or to hold any lien or encumbrance thereon and no action is pending to enforce or test the validity of such title, claim, or encumbrance, such person or his personal representative or guardian, so in possession, may commence an action to settle the title to such lands and to clear up all doubts or disputes concerning the same."
Pursuant to this statute, Harrison argues that he presented substantial evidence indicating that he and his family were in peaceable possession of the property and that any evidence the Trust Fund presented to the contrary merely created a genuine issue of material fact for the fact-finder to decide. See, e.g., Adams v. Bethany Church, 380 So.2d 788, 791 (Ala. 1980) . The Trust Fund, however, argues that the undisputed facts establish that the Harrison family was not in peaceable possession of the property; rather, it was the Trust Fund that was in peaceable possession of the property at the time this action was filed. Additionally, the Trust Fund argues that Harrison's action is barred by the rule of repose. We agree that the rule of repose bars Harrison's action.
In Boshell v. Keith, 418 So.2d 89, 91-92 (Ala.1982), this Court summarized the rule of repose as follows:
(Emphasis omitted.)
The Trust Fund claims ownership of the property by way of the 1907 deed whereby Greenberry Williams, Jr., transferred the property to Crotts and Worley. That deed was properly recorded in Colbert County, and Harrison's ancestors were accordingly on notice as of that date that another party claimed an interest in the property. See § 35-4-63, Ala.Code 1975 (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Abrams v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.
...remark on the conceptual similarities between the rule of repose and statutes of limitations. See, e.g., Harrison v. Alabama Forever Wild Land Trust, 4 So.3d 1114, 1117 (Ala. 2008) ("This principle of repose or prescription is similar to a statute of limitations, but not dependent upon one,......
-
Truss v. Chappell, 1051093.
... ... Sandra N. CHAPPELL ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... August 22, 2008 ... Ralph ... ...
-
Hinote v. Owens
...not have title’ in order to divest the title owner of property." Id. (quoting Oehmig, 638 So.2d at 850 ).In Harrison v. Alabama Forever Wild Land Trust, 4 So.3d 1114 (Ala. 2008), however, this Court held that the rule of repose applied in a quiet-title action, which was commenced by a plain......