Hartsock v. Com.

Decision Date01 February 1974
Citation505 S.W.2d 172
PartiesDewey HARTSOCK, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Dewey W. Hartsock, pro se.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Robert L. Chenoweth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

VANCE, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, appellant's motion to vacate judgment pursuant to RCr 11.42 .

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of rape of a female over twelve years of age. KRS 435.090. He was sentenced to confinement for ten years and the sentence was probated. Thereafter the probation was revoked and appellant was imprisoned. He then moved that the judgment be vacated upon the ground that his plea of guilty was not voluntary.

The transcript of the record contains the following entry relating to the plea of guilty:

'This day, the defendant was brought into this court by the Sheriff. Comes his attorney, Mr. J. Daniel Davis. The defendant, in person and by counsel, withdrew his former plea of not guilty and now pleads that he is guilty of the crime as charged in the indictment herein. By consent, the law and facts of this case were presented to the Court without the intervention of a jury. The court being advised, on the recommendation of the Commonwealth's Attorney, and agreed to by the defendant in person and by counsel, finds the defendant guilty as per his plea and fixes his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of ten years. Comes the defendant, in person and by counsel, and moves the court to withhold the rendition of the judgment herein. The Court being advised, and there being no objection on the part of the Commonwealth, sustains said motion on the condition that the defendant remain on his good behavior and refrain from trouble of any kind for a period of five years after serving his sentence in Court 2 of the indictment #132856. Ordered that the defendant be and is remanded to jail.'

Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), held that one who enters a plea of guilty waives three basic constitutional rights, viz., (1) the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination (2) the right to trial by jury and (3) the right to confront one's accusers. Boykin held that the record of the trial must affirmatively show that the waiver of those rights was voluntary and that the prisoner understood what he was waiving. It was held that waiver could not be presumed from a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Reaves
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 25 Mayo 1977
    ...An on-the-record colloquy between the trial court with the accused in which the Boykin matters are covered is required. Hartsock v. Commonwealth, 505 S.W.2d 172 (Ky.1974); see Caldwell v. Commonwealth, 503 S.W.2d 485 18. Louisiana. A procedure like that in Sisco and Brainard is deemed requi......
  • Scott v. Com., 79-SC-571-MR
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 26 Mayo 1981
    ...369 U.S. 506, 82 S.Ct. 884, 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); Hartsock v. Commonwealth, Ky., 505 S.W.2d 172 (1974). See Rules of Criminal Procedure (U.L.A.) rule There are two situations in which a defendant waives his right to be pre......
  • Kotas v. Com.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 2 Mayo 1978
    ...253, 259 (1977). The trial court was correct when it supplemented the record by means of a later evidentiary hearing. Hartsock v. Commonwealth, Ky., 505 S.W.2d 172 (1974). The alternate position of Kotas is that the evidence adduced at the subsequent hearing was insufficient to support the ......
  • Lynch v. Com.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 22 Agosto 1980
    ...that a defendant's guilty plea is being entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily before accepting same. In Hartsock v. Commonwealth, Ky., 505 S.W.2d 172 (1974), a distinction was made between those instances in which the record is entirely silent and those in which it is not altoge......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT