Howard v. State
Decision Date | 08 March 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 91-2304,91-2304 |
Citation | 615 So.2d 229 |
Parties | 18 Fla. L. Weekly D709 John HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
John Howard has appealed from an habitual felony offender sentence imposed after his conviction of battery on a law enforcement officer. We affirm.
After Howard's conviction, the state sought habitual felony offender classification based on three Florida felony convictions occurring in 1987 and 1989. Howard did not dispute these convictions, and the trial court sentenced him to 6 years as an habitual felony offender without making the findings set forth at section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989).
Howard's appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), averring that he can make no good faith argument for reversal. In its answer brief, the state notes an issue under Anderson v. State, 592 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, 613 So.2d 465, to wit: the trial court's failure to make the findings set forth at section 775.084(1)(a). In a pro se initial brief, Howard alleges the unconstitutionality of section 775.084(1)(a) Ch. 89-280, see Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), approved 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993), as well as several scoresheet errors.
As to the trial court's failure to make the findings set forth at section 775.084(1)(a), we find that, under the circumstances of this case, the error was harmless. See State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla. February 4, 1993). The issues raised by Howard pro se are without merit. See Robinson v. State, 603 So.2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ( ); Sec. 775.084(4)(e), Fla.Stat. (habitual offender sentences are not subject to the sentencing guidelines).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. State, 92-3117
...classification under section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988). McCall v. State, 616 So.2d 10 (Fla.1993); Howard v. State, 615 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Further, we note that the constitutionality of the 1988 version of section 775.084 has been challenged on identical grounds......