State v. Anderson

Decision Date11 February 1993
Docket NumberNo. 79535,79535
Citation613 So.2d 465
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. S121 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Willie ANDERSON, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Crim. Appeals and Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Carol Ann Turner, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for respondent.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Anderson v. State, 592 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), wherein the court certified the following question:

Does the holding in Eutsey v. State, 383 So.2d 219 (Fla.1980), that the state has no burden of proof as to whether the convictions necessary for habitual felony offender sentencing have been pardoned or set aside, in that they are "affirmative defenses available to [a defendant]," Eutsey at 226, relieve the trial court of its statutory obligation to make findings regarding those factors, if the defendant does not affirmatively raise, as a defense, that the qualifying convictions provided by the state have been pardoned or set aside?

Anderson, 592 So.2d at 1121. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered this question in the negative in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993), but held that harmless error analysis may be applied on appeal. We quash the decision of the district court in Anderson and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Spriggs v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Marzo 1993
    ...relying on the First District's decision to that effect in Anderson v. State, 592 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), quashed, 613 So.2d 465 (Fla.1993). Before Baskerville, we had not discussed an HFO sentence arising expressly from a plea agreement that provided for such enhanced punishment. 2......
  • Howard v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 1993
    ...In its answer brief, the state notes an issue under Anderson v. State, 592 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, 613 So.2d 465, to wit: the trial court's failure to make the findings set forth at section 775.084(1)(a). In a pro se initial brief, Howard alleges the unconstit......
  • Crenshaw v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 27 Abril 1993
    ...supreme court issued its opinion in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993), and quashed our decision in Anderson. See State v. Anderson, 613 So.2d 465 (Fla.1993). Pursuant to the supreme court's decision in Rucker, we withdraw the opinion issued October 23, 1992, and affirm appellant's s......
  • Vela v. State, 92-1685
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 Julio 1993
    ...Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See State v. Anderson, 613 So.2d 465 (Fla.1993). DAUKSCH, COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT