Hung Dang v. Judicial Review Agency Action of Wash. State Dep't of Health, Med. Quality Assurance Comm'n.

Decision Date19 August 2019
Docket NumberNo. 78910-4-I,78910-4-I
Citation450 P.3d 1189
Parties HUNG DANG, M.D., Appellant, v. Judicial Review Agency Action of the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMISSION, Respondent.
CourtWashington Court of Appeals

Hung M.D. Dang (Appearing Pro Se), 27222 10th Ave. S., Des Moines, WA, 98198, for Appellant.

Christina Lynne Pfluger, WA State Attorney General's Office, Debra Lynn Defreyn, Office of the Attorney General, 1125 Washington Street Se., P.o. Box 40100, Olympia, WA, 98504-0100

Schindler, J.

¶ 1 Hung Dang, MD appeals the superior court order affirming the decision of the Washington State Department of Health Medical Quality Assurance Commission (MQAC). MQAC concluded Dr. Dang committed unprofessional conduct in violation of the Uniform Disciplinary Act, chapter 18.130 RCW; ordered oversight of his license; and imposed at $5,000 fine. We affirm the amended MQAC decision and final order.

On Call at St. Joseph Medical Center

¶ 2 Dr. Hung Dang is an otolaryngologist, specializing in the treatment of the ear, nose, and throat (ENT). Dr. Dang works at Group Health Cooperative1 in Tacoma. As a condition of his employment with Group Health, Dr. Dang maintains staff privileges and works as an on-call emergency ENT specialist at St. Joseph Medical Center in Tacoma. St. Joseph is one of several hospitals in the CHI Franciscan Health System and is a level II trauma center. The CHI Franciscan Health System is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to providing healthcare consistent with Catholic Health Initiatives. The other hospitals include St. Francis Hospital in Federal Way, St. Clare Hospital in Lakewood, St. Anthony Hospital in Gig Harbor, and St. Elizabeth Hospital in Enumclaw.

Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act

¶ 3 The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, requires hospitals to treat patients that need emergency care. The purpose of EMTALA is to ensure that individuals receive adequate emergency medical care regardless of ability to pay. Jackson v. E. Bay Hosp., 246 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2001). Under EMTALA, a hospital must provide appropriate emergency medical care or transfer the patient to another medical facility. 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(b)(1).

¶ 4 An on-call physician may not refuse to provide medical care and treat a patient properly transferred by an emergency room (ER) physician. 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(d)(1)(B). Under 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(d)(1)(B), a physician "is responsible for the examination, treatment, or transfer of an individual in a participating hospital, including a physician on call for the care of such an individual." A hospital that can provide specialized care may not refuse to accept an appropriate transfer from a referring hospital if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the patient. 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(g), (c)(2)(B). A transfer to a medical facility is appropriate if "the transferring hospital provides the medical treatment within its capacity which minimizes the risks to the individual’s health," the receiving facility "has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual," and the receiving facility "has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment." 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd(c)(2)(A), (B).

Statewide Emergency Medical Trauma Care Centers

¶ 5 In 1990, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Statewide Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care System Act (EMSTCSA), chapter 70.168 RCW, "to establish an efficient and well-coordinated statewide emergency medical services and trauma care system." LAWS OF 1990, ch. 269; RCW 70.168.010(3). The legislature states the intent of EMSTCSA is to "reduce costs and incidence of inappropriate and inadequate trauma care and emergency medical service and minimize the human suffering and costs associated with preventable mortality and morbidity." RCW 70.168.010(3). The objective of EMSTCSA is to "(a) [p]ursue trauma prevention activities to decrease the incidence of trauma; (b) provide optimal care for the trauma victim; (c) prevent unnecessary death and disability from trauma and emergency illness; and (d) contain costs of trauma care and trauma system implementation." RCW 70.168.010(4).

¶ 6 EMSTCSA requires the Washington State Department of Health to designate trauma care services at hospitals. RCW 70.168.015(5). EMSTCSA categorizes hospitals into one of five levels of care. RCW 70.168.015(4). EMSTCSA designates the level of trauma care services at each hospital as level I to level V, the highest level of trauma care to the lowest level of trauma care. RCW 70.168.015(4), (15), (23). Lower level designated trauma centers can transfer patients to high-level hospitals for care and treatment by a specialist. RCW 70.168.015(23) ; WAC 246-976-700(8), (9). Designated trauma service care hospitals must provide emergency and trauma services to all patients requiring care without regard to ability to pay. RCW 70.168.130(3)(b).

Uniform Disciplinary Act

¶ 7 The Uniform Disciplinary Act (UDA), chapter 18.130 RCW, governs licensing and discipline of physicians. The purpose of the UDA is (1) to protect the public and (2) to protect the standing of the medical profession in the eyes of the public. In re the Revocation of the License To Practice Medicine & Surgery of Kindschi, 52 Wash.2d 8, 11, 319 P.2d 824 (1958). The UDA gives the Washington State Department of Health Medical Quality Assurance Commission (MQAC)2 the authority to regulate, monitor, and discipline physicians. RCW 18.30.040(2)(b)(ix) ; chapter 18.71 RCW; chapter 18.71A RCW.

Statement of Charges

¶ 8 On April 4, 2016, the Washington State Department of Health Medical Program (Department of Health) filed a statement of charges against Dr. Dang, alleging violation of EMTALA and RCW 18.130.180(1), (4), and (7) with respect to "Patient A," "Patient B," and "Patient C." RCW 18.130.180, "Unprofessional Conduct," provides, in pertinent part:

(1) The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption relating to the practice of the person’s profession, whether the act constitutes a crime or not....
....
(4) Incompetence, negligence, or malpractice which results in injury to a patient or which creates an unreasonable risk that a patient may be harmed....
....
(7) Violation of any state or federal statute or administrative rule regulating the profession in question, including any statute or rule defining or establishing standards of patient care or professional conduct or practice.[3]

Patient A

¶ 9 On October 20, 2012, 61-year-old Patient A went to the ER at St. Clare Hospital. St. Clare is a level IV trauma center. Patient A had a history of thyroid cancer and undergone prior neck surgery. On October 20, Patient A had "facial swelling, an enlarged tongue with airway obstruction, and difficulty with breathing and swallowing." A CT 4 scan showed

bilateral lymph node dissection of the neck, enlargement of the base of the tongue with contiguous abnormal soft tissue swelling of the left oral floor and left lateral wall of the oral cavity, possibly representing a recurrent squamous cell carcinoma or an infectious or inflammatory process.

¶ 10 St. Clare did not have an on-call ENT doctor. The ER doctor concluded Patient A needed a higher level of care from an ENT specialist. The ER doctor contacted Dr. Dang at St. Joseph to request transfer of Patient A. Dr. Dang refused to accept the transfer of Patient A because he was not on call for St. Clare but consulted with the ER doctor and said the patient could "follow up with the clinic on Monday."

¶ 11 Because of "the dangerous nature of Patient A’s possible airway obstruction," the St. Clare ER doctor believed "a more urgent consult" was necessary and transferred Patient A to Harborview Medical Center, a level I trauma center. Harborview accepted the transfer. St. Clare airlifted Patient A to Harborview. An ENT specialist diagnosed Patient A with "acute angioedema" and admitted Patient A to intensive care.

Patient B

¶ 12 On November 23, 2013, 34-year-old Patient B went to the ER at St. Francis Hospital for "sore throat, swelling, and difficulties with swallowing and breathing." St. Francis is a level IV trauma center. A CT neck scan "showed fluid collection and findings consistent with tonsillar abscess." The ER doctor concluded Patient B should be transferred to St. Joseph for consultation and treatment by an ENT specialist. St. Francis staff contacted St. Joseph on-call ENT specialist Dr. Dang to request the transfer. Dr. Dang refused to consult or accept the transfer.

Patient C

¶ 13 On June 8, 2014, 24-year-old Patient C went to the ER at St. Clare. Patient C had pain in his ear and throat and trouble swallowing. The ER doctor diagnosed Patient C with a tonsillar abscess and a potential "life-threatening" airway obstruction.

Patient C was diagnosed with tonsillar abscess (a collection of pus behind the tonsils that involves pain, swelling, and often radiates into the ear) with mild airway obstruction. The treating staff suspected a retropharyngeal abscess (deep neck space infections that can pose an immediate life-threatening emergency with potential for airway compromise).

¶ 14 The ER doctor contacted St. Joseph on-call ENT specialist Dr. Dang to request a transfer for treatment. Dr. Dang refused to consult or accept transfer of Patient C because he was not on call for St. Clare.

¶ 15 The St. Clare ER doctor contacted Harborview. After learning Harborview did not have the capacity to accept transfer of Patient C, the St. Clare ER doctor called CHI Franciscan Associate Chief Medical Officer Dr. Kim Moore. Dr. Moore authorized transfer of Patient C from St. Clare to St. Joseph for consultation and treatment by the on-call ENT doctor.

¶ 16 When Patient C arrived at St. Joseph, Dr. Dang refused to consult or treat Patient C. Dr. Moore contacted Dr. Dang. Dr. Dang told Dr. Moore he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 925, v. State
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • October 31, 2019
    ... ... , DEPARTMENT OF EARLY LEARNING, a state agency, and Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit ... Serv. Emps. Intl Union Local 925 v. Dept of Early Learning, No. 49726-3-II, 2018 WL 65 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 18, 2018) (unpublished), ... in Puget Sound Advocates for Retirement Action v. Department of Social & Health Services ( ... 8 We granted SEIU 925s petition for review. SEIU 925 v. Dept of Early Learning, 192 ... right, it is not entitled to any special judicial protection against changes in the lawthe ... ...
  • Peterson v. State
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 2023
    ...order (1) if it is based on an error of law." (emphasis added)); Dang v. Med. Quality Assur. Comm'n., 10 Wn.App. 2d 650, 664, 450 P.3d 1189 (2019) ("Under RCW 34.05.570(3), we will reverse only if (1) the administrative decision is based on an error of law." (emphasis added)); Neravetla v. ......
  • Hung Dang v. Floyd, Pflueger & Ringer, PS
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • October 17, 2022
    ...our opinion in Hung Dang v. Department of Health, in which we upheld the discipline that MQAC imposed on Dr. Dang. 10 Wn.App. 2d 650, 450 P.3d 1189 (2019), denied, 195 Wn.2d 1004, 458 P.3d 781, cert. denied, 141 S.Ct. 371, 208 L.Ed.2d 94 (2020). We summarize the facts here. Dr. Dang is an o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT