In re Cisely G.

Decision Date17 February 2011
Citation918 N.Y.S.2d 23,81 A.D.3d 508
PartiesIn re CISELY G., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
918 N.Y.S.2d 23
81 A.D.3d 508


In re CISELY G., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Presentment Agency.


Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Feb. 17, 2011.

918 N.Y.S.2d 24

Randall S. Carmel, Syosset, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for presentment agency.

TOM, J.P., SAXE, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, ROMÁN, JJ.

81 A.D.3d 508

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert R. Reed, J. at fact-finding hearing; Nancy M. Bannon, J. at disposition), entered on or about February 22, 2010, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted gang assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the finding as to attempted gang assault in the second degree, dismissing that count of the petition and remanding for a new dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The count of the petition charging appellant with committing acts constituting second-degree gang assault alleges that "with intent to cause physical injury to another person and when aided by two or more other persons actually present [she] caused/attempted to cause physical injury to such person or to a third person." However, these are not the elements of gang assault in the second degree, where the required result is serious physical injury. Therefore, this count was defective.

Moreover, attempted gang assault in the second degree is a legal impossibility for trial purposes ( Matter of Stephanie R., 196 Misc.2d 659, 766 N.Y.S.2d 313 [Family Ct., Queens County 2003] ), as "there can be no attempt to commit a crime which makes the causing of a certain result criminal even though wholly unintended" ( People v. Campbell, 72 N.Y.2d 602, 605, 535 N.Y.S.2d 580, 532 N.E.2d 86 [1988] ). Since second-degree gang assault involves the intended result of physical injury and the unintended result of serious physical injury, it is similar to first-degree manslaughter, which cannot be attempted because "there can be no attempt to commit a crime where one

of the elements is a specific intent but another, an unintended result" ( People v. McDavis, 97 A.D.2d 302, 304, 469 N.Y.S.2d 508 [1983], lv. denied 61 N.Y.2d 910, 474 N.Y.S.2d 1033, 462 N.E.2d 1211 [1984] ). The only...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United States v. Castillo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 8, 2022
    ...v. Delacruz , 177 A.D.3d 541, 110 N.Y.S.3d 682, 683 (1st Dep't 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted); In re Cisely G. , 81 A.D.3d 508, 918 N.Y.S.2d 23, 24 (1st Dep't 2011).B. Applying the categorical approach to Castillo's conviction1. The force clause The district court determined that ......
  • Heim v. Trustees of D.C. Univ. in City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 17, 2011
  • People v. Delacruz, 10414
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2019
    ...and otherwise affirmed."[A]ttempted gang assault in the second degree is a legal impossibility for trial purposes" ( Matter of Cisely G., 81 A.D.3d 508, 508, 918 N.Y.S.2d 23 [1st Dept. 2011] ; see also People v. Campbell, 72 N.Y.2d 602, 605–606, 535 N.Y.S.2d 580, 532 N.E.2d 86 [1988] ). "On......
  • People v. Davis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 3, 2022
    ...to commit a crime which makes the causing of a certain result criminal even though wholly unintended’ " ( Matter of Cisely G. , 81 A.D.3d 508, 508, 918 N.Y.S.2d 23 [1st Dept. 2011], quoting People v. Campbell , 72 N.Y.2d 602, 605, 535 N.Y.S.2d 580, 532 N.E.2d 86 [1988] ). Based on that law ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT