In re Dyer, No. SC 86236.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtMichael A. Wolff
Citation163 S.W.3d 915
Decision Date31 May 2005
Docket NumberNo. SC 86236.
PartiesIn re the Matter of Scott DYER.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 practice notes
  • State v. Shade, Case No. 115,523
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • November 16, 2017
    ...App.3d 38, 669 N.E.2d 885, 887 (1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • July 19, 2017
    ...N.E.2d 885, 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v.......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • May 11, 2017
    ...N.E.2d 885, 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v.......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • April 7, 2017
    ...App.3d 38, 669 N.E.2d 885, 887 (1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • State v. Shade, Case No. 115,523
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • November 16, 2017
    ...App.3d 38, 669 N.E.2d 885, 887 (1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • July 19, 2017
    ...N.E.2d 885, 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v.......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • May 11, 2017
    ...N.E.2d 885, 887 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v.......
  • Plumley v. State, Case Number: 114423
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • April 7, 2017
    ...App.3d 38, 669 N.E.2d 885, 887 (1995) ("Expungement is a matter of privilege, never of right.") (citation omitted). See also In re Dyer, 163 S.W.3d 915, 919 (Mo. 2005) (en banc) ("[The petitioner] has never had a substantive or vested right in expungement of his arrest record[.]"); People v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT