J. C. Carlile Corp. v. Antaki
Decision Date | 17 April 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 22219,22219 |
Citation | 162 Colo. 376,426 P.2d 549 |
Parties | J. C. CARLILE CORPORATION and the Travelers Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Alice R. ANTAKI, Robert Ruhl Antaki, Richard Francis Antaki, Ronald James Antaki, Jeannette Marie Antaki, Fredric Joseph Antaki, Victor Nadum Antaki, Jr., and the Industrial Commission of Colorado, Defendants in Error. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Wood, Ris & Hames, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.
Zarlengo, Mott & Carlin, Denver, for defendants in error.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Peter L. Dye, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant in error Industrial Commission.
The writ of error issued in this action brings before this court for review the proceedings which resulted in a district court judgment affirming an award of benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Facts pertinent to the issues herein are substantially as follows:
Prior to June 7, 1962, one Victor N. Antaki was Vice President and Chief Engineer of the J. C. Carlile Corporation. He died in an accident which occurred sometime between 8:15 P.M. on June 7, 1962, and 6:00 A.M. the following morning, at which time his body was found in an automobile owned by his employer submerged in about five feet of water in the Platte river. His surviving wife and six children filed a claim before the Industrial Commission for benefits provided by law for a death allegedly arising out of and in the course of employment of the decedent.
The only question presented for our determination on this writ of error is whether there is sufficient support for the finding of the commission that the death of Antaki was '* * * the result of an accident arising out of and within the scope of his employment * * *.'
The findings of the referee, which were adopted by the Industrial Commission, contain the following:
'The decedent sustained a broken left arm and a severe head injury, (a fractured skull).
'Several fellow employees testified that decedent indicated to them that he intended to return to his desk later on in the evening; that he left his desk unlocked, table drawers opened and working papers disarranged; and that decedent customarily always locked his desk and arranged the working papers in an orderly manner when he intended to leave the office for the day; and that he worked late on many occasions.'
There is ample evidence in the record to support the above findings relating to the activities of the decedent during the late afternoon and evening of June 7, 1962....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co. v. Baca
...assistance over the phone. The factual situation in this case falls within the purview of the rule announced in Carlile Corp. v. Antaki, 162 Colo. 376, 426 P.2d 549 (1967). See also Denver School District No. 1 v. Industrial Commission, 196 Colo. 131, 581 P.2d 1162 (1978); Mineral County v.......
-
Tatum-Reese Development Corp. v. Industrial Commission
...in the record would require a findings, as a matter of law, that intoxicants caused or contributed to the accident. J. C. Carlile Corp. v. Antaki, 162 Colo. 376, 426 P.2d 549. Order SILVERSTEIN, C.J., and ENOCH, J., concur. ...
-
Perry v. Crawford & Co.
...record also demonstrates that the employer received no direct benefit from claimant's lunchtime activities. Cf. J.C. Carlile Corp. v. Antaki, 162 Colo. 376, 426 P.2d 549 (1967); Dynalectron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, supra; Friedman's Market, Inc. v. Welham, supra; Garrett v. Miller, 4......
-
Reynolds v. Ferman Oldsmobile Co.
...Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board, 67 Cal.2d 925, 64 Cal.Rptr. 323, 434 P.2d 619 (1967); and J. C. Carlile Corporation v. Antaki, 162 Colo. 376, 426 P.2d 549 (1967). Accordingly, the order of the Industrial Relations Commission is reversed and the cause remanded with directions t......