Jackson v. Seder, 84-34
| Decision Date | 10 April 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-34,84-34 |
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 912,467 So.2d 422 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 912 Mary Geraldine Seder JACKSON, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. James P. SEDER, Appellee/Cross Appellant. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Esther A. Zaretsky, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.
James P. O'Flarity of Law Offices of James P. O'Flarity, West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross appellant.
This appeal concerns the enforceability of an antenuptial agreement.
Approximately seventeen days before their marriage, appellee gave appellant an antenuptial agreement, which his attorney had prepared, along with a financial statement. Appellant, who had consulted with an attorney a few months earlier when appellee first mentioned an antenuptial agreement, chose not to have the agreement reviewed by independent counsel. The agreement provided that each party agreed to waive, release, and forgo any claim for alimony, any claim to the property of the other, or any claim against the estate of the other. The record demonstrates that appellant knew and appreciated the effect of an antenuptial agreement, and that she entered into the agreement freely and voluntarily after full disclosure of appellee's assets.
The trial court set the agreement aside, finding that appellee's conduct amounted to overreaching, that the agreement shocked the conscience of the court, and that it lacked consideration. The trial court also found that appellant had disposed of certain items "so that she could reside with her husband," and awarded her $5,000 as reimbursement for her losses.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred when it denied her claim for periodic alimony. Appellee cross appeals and contends the trial court erred when it set aside the antenuptial agreement.
We address the issue raised on cross appeal first. The Florida Supreme Court set forth the standards of a valid antenuptial agreement in Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962).
A valid antenuptial agreement contemplates a fair and reasonable provision therein for the wife, or, absent such provision, a full and frank disclosure to the wife, before the signing of the agreement, of the husband's worth, or, absent such disclosure, a general and approximate knowledge by her of the prospective husband's property....
....
Inadequacy of provision for the wife does not in itself vitiate an antenuptial agreement. If, when she signed the contract freely and voluntarily, she had some understanding of her rights and had been fully informed by the husband as to his property or if, notwithstanding the husband's failure to disclose, she had or reasonably should have had a general and approximate knowledge of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sanford v. Sanford
...221 Neb. 792, 381 N.W.2d 109, 113-14 (1986); Hengel v. Hengel, 122 Wis.2d 737, 365 N.W.2d 16, 20 (Ct.App. 1985); Jackson v. Seder, 467 So.2d 422, 423 (Fla.Ct.App.1985); In re Estate of Lopata, 641 P.2d 952, 955 (Colo.1982); Hook v. Hook, 69 Ohio St.2d 234, 431 N.E.2d 667, 670 (1982); Laird ......
-
Wright v. Wright
...have placed Mrs. Wright on notice that she alone would be assuming the risk of loss in the event the marriage failed. Cf. Jackson v. Seder, 467 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 118 (Fla.1985). Mrs. Wright has been hurled into the proverbial "gotcha" position by this court'......
-
Levy v. Levy
...for the trial court to assess fees for all the services rendered the wife below. See § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1983); Jackson v. Seder, 467 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). II Although, in view of the unrebutted expert testimony which supports the award, Levy claims no error in the assessment of $5......
-
Baker v. Baker, 92-2563
...of competent assistance of counsel are not proper grounds upon which to vacate or modify a postnuptial agreement); Jackson v. Seder, 467 So.2d 422, 422-23 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 118 (Fla.1985) (reversing a trial court's order setting aside an antenuptial agreement because ......
-
§ 4.03 Modern Enforceability: Generally Accepted Equitable Limits
...wife refused). Florida: Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1987); Cladis v. Cladis, 512 So.2d 271 (Fla. App. 1987); Jackson v. Seder, 467 So.2d 422 (Fla. App. 1985). Illinois: In re Marriage of Sokolowski, 232 Ill. App.3d 535, 173 Ill. Dec. 701, 597 N.E.2d 675 (1992). Minnesota: In re Esta......