Jackson v. State
Decision Date | 14 July 1978 |
Docket Number | 55855,Nos. 55854,s. 55854 |
Citation | 146 Ga.App. 736,247 S.E.2d 512 |
Parties | JACKSON v. The STATE (two cases). |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Baker, Conrad & Abernathy, Elliott R. Baker, Canton, for appellant.
V. D. Stockton, Dist. Atty., Michael H. Crawford, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Jackson was twice convicted of possession of liquor in excess of the legal limit, having committed these misdemeanors on two separate occasions.He appeals both convictions.Held:
1.Enumerated error no. 1, in Case no. 55854, and enumerated error nos. 1 and 2, in Case no. 55855, relate to the denial of appellant's motion to suppress certain evidence seized pursuant to search warrants issued respective to each incident.Also enumerated as error, in each case, is the trial court's admission of testimony relating to the seized property.However, the property seized was not introduced at either trial, and appellant failed to object, at either trial, to the admission of testimony relating to the seized property.
Walker v. State, 130 Ga.App. 597, 599, 203 S.E.2d 890, 892;Baker v. State, 230 Ga. 741(2), 199 S.E.2d 252.SeeFoote v. State, 141 Ga.App. 18, 232 S.E.2d 366.Reid v. State, 129 Ga.App. 660, 663, 200 S.E.2d 456, 460.These enumerations are without merit.
2.Appellant enumerates as error, in each case, the failure of the trial judge to disqualify himself in a proceeding involving the sufficiency of search warrants which he had issued personally.However, appellant failed to raise a proper objection, and J. B. v. State of Ga., 139 Ga.App. 545, 546, 228 S.E.2d 712, 713.Therefore, these enumerations are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Miller v. State, 76630
...180 Ga.App. 234(3), 348 S.E.2d 753 (1986); Glisson v. State, 165 Ga.App. 342, 343(5), 301 S.E.2d 62 (1983); Jackson v. State, 146 Ga.App. 736(1), 247 S.E.2d 512 (1978). Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred in allowing the erroneous opinion testimony of Dr. Campion into evidence o......
-
Ramsey v. State
...by proceeding without objection with the trial of the case with knowledge of the disqualification." [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Jackson v. State, 146 Ga.App. 736(2), 247 S.E.2d 512. Compare, Ga. Power Co. v. Watts, 184 Ga. 135(4), 144, 190 S.E. 654; Moon v. State, 154 Ga.App. 312(4), 268 S.E.2d In the ......
-
Bradshaw v. State
...testimony is outside the scope of a motion to suppress, and should be objected to on the trial. [Cit.]' [Cits.]" Jackson v. State, 146 Ga.App. 736(1), 247 S.E.2d 512 (1978). Construing this enumeration as addressing the admission over objection of oral testimony concerning the post-arrest d......
-
Moon v. State
...when the fact asserted as disqualifying is known to the defendant. J. B. v. State, 139 Ga.App. 545(2), 228 S.E.2d 712; Jackson v. State, 146 Ga.App. 736(2), 247 S.E.2d 512; Nix v. State, 236 Ga. 110(1), 223 S.E.2d 81. The issue of disqualification of the trial judge cannot be raised for the......