Jennings v. State, 62600
| Decision Date | 23 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 62600,62600 |
| Citation | 473 So.2d 204,10 Fla. L. Weekly 296 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 296 Bryan F. JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Christopher S. Quarles, Chief, Capital Appeals, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
In accordance with the recent United States Supreme Court order in Jennings v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1351, 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985), vacating our decision in this cause reported as Jennings v. State, 453 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1984), we remand this cause to the trial court for a new trial in light of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), Shea v. Louisiana, 470 U.S. 51, 105 S.Ct. 1065, 84 L.Ed.2d 38 (1985), and Smith v. Illinois, 469 U.S. 91, 105 S.Ct. 490, 83 L.Ed.2d 488 (1984).
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jennings v. Crosby
...1002, 105 S.Ct. 1351, 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985) (mem.). The Florida Supreme Court then remanded the case for a new trial. See Jennings v. State, 473 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1985). Following a change of venue, Mr. Jennings' third trial commenced in Bay County, Florida, in March 1986. He was convicted of......
-
Jennings v. State, s. 75689
...Jennings v. Florida, 470 U.S. 1002, 105 S.Ct. 1351, 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985). This Court then remanded for the third trial. Jennings v. State, 473 So.2d 204 (Fla.1985).2 The trial judge imposed the death penalty, finding: (1) the murder was heinous, atrocious, or cruel; (2) the murder was cold......
-
Jennings v. State
...illegally obtained confession. Appellant confessed after his arrest, but that confession was suppressed by our ruling in Jennings v. State, 473 So.2d 204 (Fla.1985). Thereafter, the court denied appellant's motion to suppress photographs which showed two abrasions on appellant's penis. The ......