Johnson v. Com.
| Decision Date | 14 October 1980 |
| Parties | Kenneth JOHNSON, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Respondent. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
Jack E. Farley, Public Advocate, Donna Boyce Proctor, Asst. Public Advocate, Frankfort, for movant.
Steven L. Beshear, Atty. Gen., Pat Kimberlin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for respondent.
The movant, Kenneth Johnson, was convicted of first-degree burglary in the Clay Circuit Court for which he received a sentence of ten years' imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and this court granted movant's motion for discretionary review. The sole question presented in this case is at what point does the exclusive jurisdiction of the district court attach in a juvenile proceeding.
Movant and his brother were suspects in the November 11, 1977, burglary of the home of one Melvin Arnett. At the time of the crime movant was seventeen years of age. On December 16, 1977, a juvenile petition was filed in the Clay District Court charging movant with the crime. Two days later he became eighteen. On January 12, 1978, movant received a summons from the juvenile court to appear for a hearing on the petition but for unknown reasons this hearing was never held. On January 30 Johnson was indicted by the grand jury for burglary. His initial trial ended in a hung jury, yet on May 15, 1978, Johnson was tried again and convicted of first-degree burglary. During both trials movant's counsel moved to quash the indictment on the grounds that the circuit court was without jurisdiction in light of the pending juvenile petition. The trial court overruled both motions.
The pertinent portion of KRS 208.020 provides:
(1) The juvenile session of the district court of each county shall have exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child living, or found within the county who has not reached his eighteenth birthday:
(a) Who has committed a public offense .... 1
The respondent argues and the Court of Appeals agreed that the filing of the juvenile petition alone was not a "proceeding" as that term is used in the statute. We disagree.
This court has consistently held that when both the alleged offense and the commencement of juvenile proceedings occur before an accused becomes eighteen, and the proceedings are still pending at the time of indictment, the juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction. Miller v. Anderson, Ky., 519 S.W.2d 826 (1975); Koonce v. Commonwealth, Ky., 452 S.W.2d 822 (1970). As we stated in Lowry v. Commonwealth, Ky., 424 S.W.2d 841, 843 (1968):
The present statute, in effect, says that the juvenile court shall have exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child who has not reached his eighteenth birthday .... This is indicative of the legislative intent to restrict proceedings in the juvenile court to persons who are proceeded against therein before becoming eighteen years of age. The conclusion is thus reached that, under the language of KRS 208.020, the juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction only...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
T.J. v. Bell
...jurisdiction unless a juvenile qualifies for transfer after the statutory requirements for transfer are satisfied. Johnson v.Commonwealth, 606 S.W.2d 622, 623 (Ky. 1980); KRS 610.010(1); KRS 635.020; KRS 640.010. Pursuant to KRS 635.020(4), a juvenile's transfer is never automatic. Therefor......
-
Commonwealth v. B.H.
...S.W.3d 486, 487 (Ky. 2008) (internal citations omitted). The code is intended to provide safeguards for juveniles. Johnson v. Commonwealth, 606 S.W.2d 622, 623 (Ky. 1980). The jurisdiction of district courts is exclusive relating to minors unless jurisdiction is vested by law in some other ......
-
E.B., Jr. v. Canterbury
...not have handed down indictment against juvenile defendant if it was known that he was under 18 years of age); Johnson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 606 S.W.2d 622 (Ky.1980) (juvenile court obtained exclusive jurisdiction when juvenile petition was filed and pending, and since no transfer he......
-
Ivey v. Com.
...it is necessary to hold the waiver hearing, even if the accused is over eighteen when the indictment is returned. Johnson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 606 S.W.2d 622 (1980). Ivey was under eighteen years of age when he committed the offense, when juvenile charges were brought against him, and when......