Kenney v. State, 92-544

Decision Date31 December 1992
Docket NumberNo. 92-544,92-544
Citation611 So.2d 575
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D247 Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Sara D. Baggett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a criminal conviction, we must reject appellant's contention that the trial court failed to conduct the inquiry required by Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). While appellant expressed dissatisfaction with his lawyer during the trial, such dissatisfaction was based solely upon a claim that the lawyer had not made adequate visits to the jail. Appellant raised no instance of incompetence or inadequacy in the lawyer's handling of the defense. Since no error is shown, the convictions and sentences are affirmed. Watts v. State, 593 So.2d 198 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3006, 120 L.Ed.2d 881 (1992); Johnson v. State, 560 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

ALLEN, J., dissents with written opinion.

ALLEN, Judge, dissenting.

When a defendant in a criminal case informs a trial judge that he wishes to discharge his court-appointed counsel, the judge must inquire of the defendant as to his reason for requesting discharge. If incompetency of counsel is given as a reason, the judge must make a sufficient inquiry of the defendant and his appointed counsel to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that the counsel is not rendering effective assistance to the defendant. If reasonable cause for such belief appears, the judge should make a finding to that effect on the record and appoint a substitute attorney. If no reasonable basis appears for a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel, the judge should so state on the record and advise the defendant that if he discharges his counsel the state may not be required to appoint a substitute. See Hardwick v. State, 521 So.2d 1071 (Fla.1988); Davenport v. State, 596 So.2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Perkins v. State, 585 So.2d 390 (Fla 1st DCA 1991); Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

During the first day of trial, the following transpired:

MR. BAZLEY [Defense Counsel]: Your Honor, if I may make a motion before the jury comes in.

Mr. Kenney has spoken with me and he no longer requests me to represent him in this matter and, you know, I believe he would like to make a statement to the court, and I would ask permission to withdraw from the case because he does not feel he is being adequately represented.

THE COURT: Mr. Kenney, I'd be happy to hear anything you want to say.

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. This attorney, I haven't seen him since last month, you know, and there's no way he can say, you know, he's ready to bring me in front of, you know, the jury and say we are going to, you know, perform a trial, you know, by him reading from depositions. He's supposed to already know that, you know?

I haven't seen him not one time. He hasn't been to the jail not once, you know, pertaining to this situation. You know, how can he come in here and perform a trial, you know, for me for my defense? Ain't no way he can do that.

THE COURT: Well, what it is [sic] you propose to do, Mr. Kinney, at this point?

THE DEFENDANT: What am I supposed to do?

THE COURT: This is the second lawyer you've had now. What is it you propose to do if you're going to release Mr. Bazley?

THE DEFENDANT: What I'm saying is this Judge. The lawyer is supposed to represent me, this is what I'm saying, to the best of his knowledge, you know, because he got his license from the Florida Bar and he was under oath when he took his license to do that. This lawyer is not doing that. This lawyer hasn't been over there to see me not once pertaining to this case.

THE COURT: Well, what is it you propose to do, Mr. Kenney? Do you want to represent yourself?

THE DEFENDANT: He's supposed to prepare--

THE COURT: Do you want to represent yourself, Mr. Kenney?

THE DEFENDANT: No, sir, I don't.

THE COURT: Well, I'm not going to relieve Mr. Bazley after a half a day of trial and appoint someone else to represent you.

THE DEFENDANT: But, see, we had this problem along the way, a while back also, you know, because I tried to file several motions, you know?

THE COURT: Mr. Kenney, all I want to know from you is do you want to represent yourself at this point?

THE DEFENDANT: No, sir, I don't want to represent myself and I do not want Mr. Bazley to represent me.

THE COURT: The court has found nothing at this point in the trial to suggest that Mr. Bazley is in any way incompetent to represent you or that he's unprepared to represent you.

THE DEFENDANT: Well, he got--

THE COURT: On the contrary, it appears to the court that Mr. Bazley is doing the best that he can with a difficult case.

Now, since you don't want to represent yourself and I don't intend halfway through the trial to appoint a third lawyer to represent you--

THE DEFENDANT: No, this will only be a second one.

THE COURT: No, it would be your third.

THE DEFENDANT: No, second.

THE COURT: No it would be the third, Mr. Kenney, because Mr. Hellmuth previously moved to withdraw in this case and that's how you got Mr. Bazley.

THE DEFENDANT: Right.

THE COURT: So, it would be the third lawyer.

THE DEFENDANT: Right. But what I'm saying is this.

THE COURT: What I'm saying is that your motion is denied.

THE DEFENDANT: Oh, okay.

THE COURT: And Mr. Bazley, your motion to withdraw is likewise denied.

(Emphasis supplied.)

The appellant therefore told the trial judge that he wanted to discharge his court-appointed counsel because the lawyer had not adequately prepared for trial. This was an allegation of incompetence of counsel which immediately obligated the judge to follow the procedure outlined in the decisions cited above....

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Wilson v. State, 3D98-3388.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 d3 Março d3 2000
    ...inquiry. See Augsberger v. State, 655 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Lee v. State, 641 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kenney v. State, 611 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 3. The evidence against the defendant was considerable. The attending physic......
  • Soto v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 d3 Dezembro d3 1999
    ...Mere failure to make what a defendant considers adequate visits to him in jail is not an issue of competency. See Kenney v. State, 611 So.2d 575, 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Soto also complained that his attorney had failed to file any motions. The record belies this allegation, as there are d......
  • Augsberger v. State, 93-03047
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 d5 Maio d5 1995
    ...claim of incompetence, does not require a full Nelson inquiry. Lee v. State, 641 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kenney v. State, 611 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Just as important to our analysis is the critical factor that appellant never made a request for replacement of counsel with an......
  • Merelus v. State, 98-206.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 2 d3 Junho d3 1999
    ...inquiry. See Augsberger v. State, 655 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Lee v. State, 641 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kenney v. State, 611 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). 3. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT